From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Wd4NI-0005UM-MA for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:06:36 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Wd4NH-0006U2-9x for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:06:36 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id d49so1194165eek.13 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:06:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CRDW4qvFVp9RcgoUEcTNsnWVmFCvnEMDOjZAfT1SABk=; b=L5n4UvuUX+I/8aDOODdYhPpszEV2G0GV8kWK1fhA6eaSNYuVQPcMCSTc2WVaeEr0a2 qCNc96PtNGV7uyHvji8XUphrfrd1T0KcAU72RIaLTJn0PCNm+cyyS5RgmArrrXsZAX4b ayeB+FflkiEMzwxa9XcBLTvhMqxAEULnUpeIrNCP7bwBf4AHhGtOdPFKWyAu6iFz/HFx WfZuNVjo+XzpieMHrsBBexo8PMFoF58Y1caIp3NdAE9ImSESrOItJrTzl8wSH9CRFqEL MQ9P8E3ETs8N58VrYslKzitei00AQQa3FGtrKs+5I9KMMeNqCTE8n8tU/c4thBodGgjI glsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlbdIoGWCkcxJAjV1VyWYi7RwaD5xWVL9wQRW0ws9swhY1ZhzVLkEo23dmDS/Ed7kmH0YEW X-Received: by 10.14.99.68 with SMTP id w44mr20005818eef.82.1398287188728; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tetra.site (nat-0-15.lam.cz. [80.92.242.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 48sm9561480eei.24.2014.04.23.14.06.26 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:06:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53582B52.70205@gk2.sk> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 23:06:26 +0200 From: Pavol Rusnak User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Bitcoin Dev References: <201404232032.08740.luke@dashjr.org> <53582426.4030601@gk2.sk> <201404232041.14664.luke@dashjr.org> <5358260D.9040607@gk2.sk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header X-Headers-End: 1Wd4NH-0006U2-9x Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:06:36 -0000 On 04/23/2014 10:54 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote: > Would you consider software which scans all accounts as specified by > BIP64, but has no user interface option to distinguish them in any > way, view them independently, and has no ability to keep the coins > apart... compatible with BIP64? This is not a desired behavior. Do you have any idea how to make it even more explicit in the spec? Currently we just have (in Account sectrion): "This level splits the key space into independent user identities, so the wallet never mixes the coins across different accounts." I would like to make it obvious from the spec that if you mix funds accross the accounts you are not doing a right thing and you are not compliant to the spec. -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol Rusnak