From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WgvCN-00029C-Tp for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 04 May 2014 12:07:15 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from p3plsmtpa08-09.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([173.201.193.110]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1WgvCM-00047Q-Sm for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 04 May 2014 12:07:15 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([190.19.169.149]) by p3plsmtpa08-09.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id xo761n0073DkUH201o77WE; Sun, 04 May 2014 05:07:08 -0700 Message-ID: <53662D89.5070106@certimix.com> Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 09:07:37 -0300 From: Sergio Lerner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net References: <218332ea-948d-4af0-b4c5-ced83f25d734@email.android.com> <53653B90.4070401@monetize.io> In-Reply-To: <53653B90.4070401@monetize.io> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [173.201.193.110 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Headers-End: 1WgvCM-00047Q-Sm Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bug with handing of OP_RETURN? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 12:07:16 -0000 El 03/05/2014 03:55 p.m., Mark Friedenbach escribió: > > On 05/03/2014 11:39 AM, Peter Todd wrote: >> The standard format ended up being exactly: >> >> OP_RETURN <0 to 40-byte PUSHDATA> >> Please remember that the code actually does not implement the "standard format" (at least the last time I checked it). Any opcode after OP_RETURN is accepted: For example: OP_RETURN OP_CHECKSIG is accepted.