From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XgMIq-0000VE-R8 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:23:52 +0000 Received: from dd32718.kasserver.com ([85.13.150.64]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1XgMIo-0000JI-Nk for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:23:52 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (ip-95-222-210-186.hsi15.unitymediagroup.de [95.222.210.186]) by dd32718.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCD004900086 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 01:06:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5445957C.9060408@bitwatch.co> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 01:06:36 +0200 From: "mbde@bitwatch.co" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090500040507040804090108" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Headers-End: 1XgMIo-0000JI-Nk Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] About watch-only addresses X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:23:53 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090500040507040804090108 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is just a guess, but I can imagine sipa's address index branch might be more suitable for an use case where information about any address is required - jmcorgan continued to maintain a usually somewhat up-to-date version: https://github.com/jmcorgan/bitcoin/tree/addrindex As for balance queries, that's not possible out of the box and I have my own branch for this with a few other RPC calls that are noted in the README: https://github.com/dexX7/bitcoin/tree/master-addrindex-extended When using the original, you need to ensure a transaction is part of the main chain and wasn't orphaned. If you consider using my branch, please consider it twice and review the changes first. -------- Original Message -------- *Subject: *Re: [Bitcoin-development] About watch-only addresses *From: *Warren Togami Jr. *To: *Bitcoin Dev *Date: *Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:37:40 -1000 > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=320695 > I made a branch of Bitcoin 0.9.3 plus backports including watch-only > and a huge pile of patches cleaning it up from the master branch. It > seems to work fine although it is not heavily tested. I suppose if > you use ONLY for watch-only it can't be harmful? Dunno. > > Warren > > On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Wladimir > wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Flavien Charlon > > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > What is the status of watch-only addresses in Bitcoin Core? Is > it merged in > > master and usable? Is there documentation on how to add a > watch-only address > > through RPC. > > It has been merged. There is the "importaddress" RPC call, which works > the same as "importprivkey" except that you a pass it an address. > > > Also, I believe that is going towards the 0.10 release, is there > a rough ETA > > for a release candidate? > > Yes - aim is in a few months, probably by the end of the year. > > AFAIK there are no nightly builds at this moment. Warren Togami was > building them for a while (at http://nightly.bitcoin.it/) but he > stopped some time around June. > > It's not recommended to use master without at least a little bit of > development/debugging experience of yourself (to trace down problems > when they appear), so it's best to build it yourself if you're going > to test day-to-day development versions. > > Wladimir > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. > Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. > Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push > notifications. > Take corrective actions from your mobile device. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. > Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. > Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. > Take corrective actions from your mobile device. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho > > > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development --------------090500040507040804090108 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is just a guess, but I can imagin= e sipa's address index branch might be more suitable for an use case where information about any address is required - jmcorgan continued to maintain a usually somewhat up-to-date version:

https://github.com/jmcorgan/bitcoin/tree/addr= index

As for balance queries, that's not possible out of the box and I have my own branch for this with a few other RPC calls that are noted in the README:

https://github.com/dexX7/bitcoin= /tree/master-addrindex-extended

When using the original, you need to ensure a transaction is part of the main chain and wasn't orphaned. If you consider using my branch, please consider it twice and review the changes first.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] About watch-only addresses
From: Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net&g= t;
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:37:40 -1000
https= ://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D320695
I made a branch of Bitcoin 0.9.3 plus backports including watch-only and a huge pile of patches cleaning it up from the master branch.=A0 It seems to work fine although it is not heavily tested.=A0 I suppose if you use ONLY for watch-only it can't be harmful?=A0 Dunno.

Warren

On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Wladimir <laanwj@g= mail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Flavien Charlo= n
<flavien.cha= rlon@coinprism.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of watch-only addresses in Bitcoin Core? Is it merged in
> master and usable? Is there documentation on how to add a watch-only address
> through RPC.

It has been merged. There is the "importaddress" RPC call, which works
the same as "importprivkey" except that you a pass it an address.

> Also, I believe that is going towards the 0.10 release, is there a rough ETA
> for a release candidate?

Yes - aim is in a few months, probably by the end of the year.

AFAIK there are no nightly builds at this moment. Warren Togami was
building them for a while (at http:= //nightly.bitcoin.it/) but he
stopped some time around June.

It's not recommended to use master without at least a little bit of
development/debugging experience of yourself (to trace down problems
when they appear), so it's best to build it yourself if you're going
to test day-to-day development versions.

Wladimir

-------------------------------------------------------------------------= -----
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
B= itcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listi= nfo/bitcoin-development



----------------------------------------------------=
--------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http=
://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho


_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/l=
istinfo/bitcoin-development

--------------090500040507040804090108--