From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XgreO-0007LI-Uv for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 08:52:13 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1XgreM-00059o-Vw for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 08:52:12 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id x12so3282171wgg.32 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 01:52:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CIW18dnLdeS93LcAKzT2bFRa9Lu8dziPDvpbUAMARo0=; b=T8VNX1/WSIoXz7K7Rz1+MbqIQaMX5+mtLNRIlufxHDz7Jc3eNDwE/8pShIjUH+DSgn a3MkAOmmAXHe54bYoSiFoTRW0wbQZC6gFscAuFdl5XAsAzo0hj7utYwhBWunsmP0dQed 8NZUIlBbHUaPEKnFD4ER3jyAzZE+UGvsY8c8NaQ3oK+9s0j/3/dW4PkytRj1HtgmPUpi Vr1RmxGUOZvadbGnceCrqos2IPYtVn4H1VZbjTh8UusxheZin7oApeWZTCK762uu7GRu ArtfBQyJlZdBN3NxeYT7IqfyfoxoYolWAj5BiqzUu7j+M/z+wCaNEo57Q1A5/zbMedsF D/Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlpPcXoDcAopW1qz3Pe12ZKSKG/JE3vDhZ5JMBl1drTWHILahvQnQVsLy/8zh+9zPLukKul X-Received: by 10.180.95.41 with SMTP id dh9mr1335253wib.0.1413967924558; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 01:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tetra.site ([185.68.216.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id da10sm628814wib.0.2014.10.22.01.52.02 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 01:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54477031.8040200@gk2.sk> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:52:01 +0200 From: Pavol Rusnak User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris D'Costa References: <5446C872.7050302@gk2.sk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.5 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [185.68.216.104 listed in psbl.surriel.com] X-Headers-End: 1XgreM-00059o-Vw Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] cryptographic review requested X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 08:52:13 -0000 On 10/22/2014 10:46 AM, Chris D'Costa wrote: > Looks great, but how would you resolve the problem of knowing for certain > that the public key you have received to encrypt the message is not from a > MITM? Isn't this the same problem with PGP? -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol Rusnak