From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YIRGh-0004uO-FD for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:23:03 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YIRGf-0005wO-2t for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:23:03 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id n3so18454648wiv.3 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:22:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=a9idgFT0l+t+L7fmCQOsGa1Z4NNElfr4FKTpiDh+WYw=; b=KiHyRUhg+kAbndKJLMVz9TrqwtHz1l7vp342AzcyTE27gqC1PkyyjfiHwO+qbRnaX+ k69wd8ZU6kI44VTxzU2yyx8ADtPma10toJFeTAZzLzKjO2DiZ0P+LkqUGLMX4ro7dYbc upC4CIQxa3MUTkADHPy4WcfFo6TKyaGt/NVSuZdZgOeUPhUZPT7zMlF2X39bsH+9he0H 7MMd0iV/yeH5A2Nz5fwWu4QgA1iclKWDhECUMpFS2t21w6zrWSQVUG5NWG8lyVDTO+fW opDwTXBug5z1i+xSGxZBkozUH548vg+IjSabh54/tScYs7vRm7aM1lF3Wgtzsc2o/3FF Gu0g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnDNJCZ8nUl3j9jeSsigDiqbTDZuf8DLPiHtwhPe+zcKe5uubjIAlkX0gwvMr0xOfgNddPu X-Received: by 10.180.109.193 with SMTP id hu1mr29828648wib.25.1422922974780; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:22:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from tetra.site ([185.68.216.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r3sm22049434wic.10.2015.02.02.16.22.52 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:22:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54D014DB.50404@gk2.sk> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 01:22:51 +0100 From: Pavol Rusnak User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Schildbach , bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net References: <54CF74A5.3050304@gk2.sk> <54CF9016.5070206@gk2.sk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1YIRGf-0005wO-2t Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:23:03 -0000 On 03/02/15 01:05, Andreas Schildbach wrote: > I don't think that parameterizing will work, we can't predict future > BIPs. It's the same as for BIP43, in the end we agreed on just putting > the BIP number. Hm, let me put the questions the other way around: What gap limit should a wallet use if it encounters h=bip32? What h value should I use for myTREZOR wallets? Which is essentially a BIP44 wallet that produces h=bip32 xpubs with gap limit 20 ... -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol Rusnak