From: Andrew Lapp <lapp0@purdue.edu>
To: pagecr@gmail.com
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for comments on hybrid, PoW/PoS enhancement for Bitcoin
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:58:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54EE459B.1090301@purdue.edu> (raw)
Having stakeholders "endorse" blocks has, according to you, the benefits
of increasing the number of full nodes and making a 51% attack more
expensive. It seems to me it would have the opposite effects and other
negative side effects. Any stakeholder that has "won" could just be
running an SPV client and be informed by a full node that they have won,
then cooperate to collect the reward. You are mistaking proof of stake
as a proof you are running a full node. At the same time, the network
becomes cheaper to attack in proportion to the amount of the block
reward that is paid to "endorsers". Another side effect is that miners
would have a bigger economy of scale. The more stake a miner has, the
more they can "endorse" their own blocks and not others blocks. I
recommend reading this: https://download.wpsoftware.net/bitcoin/pos.pdf
-Andrew Lapp
next reply other threads:[~2015-02-25 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-25 21:58 Andrew Lapp [this message]
2015-02-26 1:21 ` [Bitcoin-development] Request for comments on hybrid, PoW/PoS enhancement for Bitcoin Chris Page
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-23 19:27 [Bitcoin-development] Request for comments on hybrid " Chris Page
2015-02-24 14:54 ` Jameson Lopp
2015-02-24 17:13 ` Chris Page
2015-02-25 12:30 ` Mike Hearn
2015-02-25 13:43 ` Chris Page
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54EE459B.1090301@purdue.edu \
--to=lapp0@purdue.edu \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=pagecr@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox