From: Wendell <w@grabhive.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] SPV client in pure JavaScript?
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 14:05:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F09675-D6A7-4415-82F1-920248E8188D@grabhive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP2c6nsf2z5_hKDfHdO1HEJ+Y+aoiSdfYPMxK_jzrvLEow@mail.gmail.com>
Right, I'm not suggesting that we have this wallet in a web app, but rather precisely what you are talking about: using special browser features, and bundling it. I am fundamentally monoculture-opposed, but given Chrome's present installed base, that initial target makes sense to me, provided that we could have a one-click installation (as per normal, via the Chrome Store).
Chrome also has this "Native Client" plug-in: I know next to nothing about it, and this goes off the rails of the Subject, but perhaps an SPV implementation there could be a solution to the concerns you expressed?
-wendell
grabhive.com | twitter.com/grabhive | gpg: 6C0C9411
On Aug 9, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> JavaScript is turing complete so of course it can be done. The real question you're asking is, can it be done in a web app? I think the answer is I think "no" because web apps aren't allowed to make raw TCP socket connections.
>
> Now there may be a way around that by using browser-specific things like extensions or "installable apps" which give your code greater access permissions. This approach means you essentially use Chrome as your app platform instead of a JVM, the assumption presumably being that more users have Chrome than a JVM. The flip side is that users who don't would probably balk at the idea of installing an entire browser in order to run a wallet app, whereas a JVM can be bundled and the resulting app acts like any other. I don't know of a convenient way to "statically link" Chrome into a regular-looking application.
>
> I personally wouldn't find such a design compelling. Whilst Java isn't exactly a great language, JavaScript is significantly worse in virtually all aspects. I don't understand why anyone would want to use JavaScript outside the browser - you get less safety, less performance, fewer features, less mature tools and so on. If the end result is an installable app like any other, all you did is cripple yourself vs the competition that's using languages/platforms designed for it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-09 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-09 11:32 [Bitcoin-development] SPV client in pure JavaScript? Wendell
2013-08-09 11:48 ` Mike Hearn
2013-08-09 12:05 ` Wendell [this message]
2013-08-09 12:10 ` Mike Hearn
2013-08-09 12:14 ` Mike Hearn
2013-08-09 13:05 ` Wendell
2013-08-13 5:26 ` Chris Double
2013-08-09 13:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2013-08-09 17:58 ` Wendell
2013-08-09 18:09 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F09675-D6A7-4415-82F1-920248E8188D@grabhive.com \
--to=w@grabhive.com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mike@plan99.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox