From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Z2jOM-0003CV-Na for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:02:18 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from uschroder.com ([74.142.93.202]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1Z2jOL-0004yu-EJ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:02:18 +0000 Received: from [192.168.253.4] (cpe-74-132-161-228.kya.res.rr.com [74.132.161.228]) by uschroder.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24B1422DF1333; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:46:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <557869F9.8030109@AndySchroder.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:46:49 -0400 From: Andy Schroder User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Wladimir J. van der Laan" , xor References: <1943127.DBnVxmfOIh@1337h4x0r> <20150610093556.GA11409@amethyst.visucore.com> In-Reply-To: <20150610093556.GA11409@amethyst.visucore.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=2D44186B; url=http://andyschroder.com/static/AndySchroder.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1Z2jOL-0004yu-EJ Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:02:18 -0000 Regarding changing the e-mail list provider. Is anyone interested in sponsoring it? There are non-free options, but it may be difficult to always ensure the fee is being paid to the provider. I think finding an agreeable free solution may have been the issue before? I've also thought of trying to make a pay per message or byte solution (and this cost could be dynamic based upon the number of current mailing list subscribers). This could solve the who pays problem (the sender pays), as well as motivate people to be more concise and clear with their messages, and at the same time limit spam. Any thoughts? Andy Schroder On 06/10/2015 05:35 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:25:12AM +0200, xor wrote: >> http://www.howtogeek.com/218764/warning-don%E2%80%99t-download-software-from-sourceforge-if-you-can-help-it/ > All our downloads (even old ones) have recently been deleted from sourceforge, for this reason. They haven't been mentioned in Bitcon Core release announcements for a long time. > > No opinion on the mailing list. Though I think it's less urgent. The issue of moving the mailinglist has come up before a few times and people can't agree where to move to. > > Wladimir > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------