Hello,
I'm not sure if anyone has submitted a request for gmane to
monitor and archive this new list, but I did. Maybe it's not best
for many people to re-request that? For those who aren't aware,
gmane has a nice HTTP/HTML archive as well as a newsgroup proxy
that is also very nice for reading the archive. They'll also
subscribe the list to mail-archive.com for you.
I've also noticed that gmane
(
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bitcoin.devel) does not have
exactly the same archive for the old bitcoin-development list
(
http://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-development/).
It's missing a few months at the beginning. The new list archive
does contain the same thing as the old list
(
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/).
gmane has an option to import old archives, so I'm seeing if they
can do that with the
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/ list,
since it is complete. In order to avoid confusion on what list is
the most complete, if they can, I may request them delete or
rename their old, incomplete archive at
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bitcoin.devel . It's possible they
could even make this new list use that same name after deleting or
renaming that old archive.
There is also bitcoin-list
(
http://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-list/). I think
that one may be discontinued? That list appears to be older and
contains some of Satoshi's original e-mails. On gmane though
(
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bitcoin.user), it is missing the
first few years of archives. Do we want to try and preserve this
historical correspondence on any way before sourceforce
disappears?
Regarding message footers and the subject prefix of [bitcoin-dev],
it would be cool if mailman allowed people to change this on a
per-user basis.
Andy Schroder
On 06/21/2015 05:29 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: