From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48A3ABAC for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:21:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:13:46 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.help.org (mail.help.org [70.90.2.18]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 964F6E3 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.10.25] (B [10.1.10.25]) by mail.help.org with ESMTPA ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:21:05 -0400 To: Jeff Garzik , bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: From: Milly Bitcoin Message-ID: <558B496C.2050702@bitcoins.info> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:21:00 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Process and Votes X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:21:08 -0000 >There is no voting in the way you think. Devs commit changes the users will accept and use. Users "fire" developers by choosing different devs or different software. >Standard open source method. Most open source projects do not require 100% user adoption in order for other users to be compatible. Very different than most open source projects. Repeating "stock" answers does nothing to advanced the discussion. Russ