From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A5F0273 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:29:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from smtp81.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp81.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.81]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F316F2 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp19.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp19.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 646A21802D7; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:29:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by smtp19.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: randi-AT-codehalo.com) with ESMTPSA id 2EC26180284; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:29:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Sender-Id: randi@codehalo.com Received: from Randis-MacBook-Pro.local (ool-44c253c0.dyn.optonline.net [68.194.83.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.4.2); Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:29:08 GMT Message-ID: <558EC143.9000808@codehalo.com> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:29:07 -0400 From: Randi Joseph User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Todd , Michael Naber , bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <1EF70EBC-8BB8-4A93-8591-52B2B0335F6C@petertodd.org> In-Reply-To: <1EF70EBC-8BB8-4A93-8591-52B2B0335F6C@petertodd.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040104050705020104010806" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Proposed Compromise to the Block Size Limit X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:29:10 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040104050705020104010806 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I wish you were just as prudent when you were recommending full RBF to mining pools. On 6/27/15 11:21 AM, Peter Todd wrote: > It's not a reasonable path forward right now given the lack of testing done with 8MB+ blocks, among many other problems. A way to help make that appear more reasonable would be to setup a 8MB testnet as I suggested, with two years or so of 8MB blocks in history as well as a large UTXO set to test performance characteristics. -- Randi Joseph --------------040104050705020104010806 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I wish you were just as prudent when you were recommending full RBF to mining pools.

On 6/27/15 11:21 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
It's not a reasonable path forward right now given the lack of testing done with 8MB+ blocks, among many other problems. A way to help make that appear more reasonable would be to setup a 8MB testnet as I suggested, with two years or so of 8MB blocks in history as well as a large UTXO set to test performance characteristics.


--
Randi Joseph
--------------040104050705020104010806--