From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC036323 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 01:49:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from uschroder.com (uschroder.com [74.142.93.202]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D21BA7 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 01:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.253.4] (cpe-74-132-161-228.kya.res.rr.com [74.132.161.228]) by uschroder.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 900F022E43E2C; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 21:49:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5590A432.9080102@AndySchroder.com> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 21:49:38 -0400 From: Andy Schroder User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: grarpamp , bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=2D44186B; url=http://andyschroder.com/static/AndySchroder.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="V8uCbUXJxVWaeVch9SuoMk5MWX2AWShqp" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Mailing List Administrivia - GPG, Archives, Breakage, TODO, mirrors, etc X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 01:49:42 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --V8uCbUXJxVWaeVch9SuoMk5MWX2AWShqp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Although I'd say your writing style is a bit unfriendly and hard to=20 identify/unclear at the specifics of some of your complaints, I do agree = with many of your points. I really have no idea what format the .txt.gz files are in that are on=20 the current archive. If you unzip them, they are not text tiles. gmane was able to change the subscription of the previous list to the=20 current list. So, anyone who had a newsreader setup, it should be=20 working again. There is some gap in their archive at the beginning of=20 the archive, as well as last week while the list was transitioned. They=20 requested a link to a single mbox file archive that they can use to=20 restore the list archive in it's entirety. Anyone know how we can get=20 this? The reference to another mailing list below=20 (https://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/) has such a link on its=20 archive page. It looks like the same interface so maybe that feature can = just be turned on? I'm not sure if it gzips the mbox file on the fly=20 whenever an http request is made or if it has some schedule and may be=20 missing a few of the most recent messages? Also, regarding the footer, if it can't be changed on a per user basis,=20 I'd vote to get rid of it. Anyone with a reasonably powered brain can go = to lists.linuxfoundation.org and find a way to get to the bitcoin-dev=20 mailing list page. The information provided in the footer is also=20 included in the email message headers as well. It's also included in the = welcome e-mail when someone subscribes to the list. Andy Schroder On 06/27/2015 06:21 PM, grarpamp wrote: > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Frank Flores wrot= e: >> If you're going to go through the trouble of signing your public email= s ... > ... then you should also demand that the official archives of your > favorite lists preserve them and their verifiability in the supposedly > canonical reference "mbox" format that they distribute. > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan > wrote: >> Subject: [bitcoin-dev] New GPG signing key for Bitcoin Core binary rel= eases > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/009045= =2Ehtml > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June.txt.gz= > > As you can clearly see, both the HTML archives and the "mbox" > archives have corrupted this message, it will not verify. Do not > try to say this case is trivial, the problem itself is not trivial, > it's gratuitous, and it applies to all matching messages... text, > code, binary inline... that's dangerous. > > Do not try to say this corruption prevents spam, it does not. > Spammers simply subscribe to the list and harvest everything > efficiently in realtime... no webcrawling overhead, no stale > addresses. Obfuscation is futile. > > This misfeature needs to be disabled. > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Warren Togami Jr. = wrote: >> archives will be exported >> and imported into the new list server > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Andy Schroder = wrote: >> I'm not sure if anyone has submitted a request for gmane > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:35 PM, s7r wrote: >> Do we have all the archives imported? I run several full nodes and >> mirrors for open source projects, if you think it's useful, I can >> provide a mirror for the mail list archives. > Yes... these other mirrors, archives, analysis, journalism, and > interfaces are useful. However, as it is now, there are no useful > authoritative sources for them to seed from... they're all corrupt. > And any subscribed realtime sources, though nice, are subject to > downtime, administrative and other unrecoverable gaps. Your mirror > project is a fine idea, you should demand that the pristine historical > sources be made publicly available. Not just for you, but for everyone.= > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015, grarpamp wrote: >> ... > As before, the current "mbox" archives are broken and not useful... > > a) They corrupt message data, messages are unverifiable, another exampl= e... > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/00= 9132.html > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June.tx= t.gz > b) They are missing the minimum set of original headers necessary > for fully replyable, threadable, sortable, searchable, context > preserving and direct use by users MUA's in their local environment= : > (Date, From, To, Cc, Subject, Message-ID, In-Reply-To, References) > c) They do not include attachments (patches, signatures, images, crypto= , > data) that are absolutely necessary to the context and archives > of all lists. Instead they stupidly throw them away to "web links" > which results not only in uselessness of the so called "mbox" > version, but in many thousands of needless fetches by archive > users and indexers. And hours of wasted work attempting to > postprocess them into usable form. > Valuable content lost from the "mbox" files this June alone: > 418 attachment.html > 106 attachment.sig > 6 attachment.jpe > 4 attachment.png > 2 attachment.bin > d) There appear to be at least 15 instances of unescaped '^From ' > in the "mbox". Regeneration with current mailman may fix. One such > case is here: > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2014-January= /004245.html > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2014-January= =2Etxt.gz > > > > Please fix all the above mentioned issues by providing the full raw > archives in regularly updated [gzip/7z] mbox format. The internet > thanks you :) > > Example, compare the "Downloadable version"s here: > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/ > https://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/ > https://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2015-February/006820.html > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Andy Schroder = wrote: >> Regarding message footers and the subject prefix > Yes, they're also corruptive and space wasting clutter, for and by > the clueless :( Both of them should be turned off. > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > > --V8uCbUXJxVWaeVch9SuoMk5MWX2AWShqp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVkKQyAAoJEDT679stRBhrLDkH/0eRE8np2R8AI9gsU6V1kT3j tOgzgah3pgm1R1+DpDciS7FSPNFCTBi4QhCMzH+EGPIS3T3RVgR2cV3+8MlhtNIm srbijS+Z2JB5Y3NPZt5O4Xl/3JSbMC9yvVu4/29av92zTz0Id5CgFU8ivN2cXJEO 8DB5jfyyLVVwAeKVXj6daEV1W1RxilccIT7pacgiMjobep4fzHzXtCpXzuATI570 HQepRaYj70wWBlzKtNUunb5h7ImIQFN0CZVpWwu6qAIRNCHuEGrW+V94C/x32wTp rIz0ZupwK+oniijDIHKFYjwDeuvtsIlZlz2804v8sygsdEmihw/T8ttR8jl6Cis= =drzp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V8uCbUXJxVWaeVch9SuoMk5MWX2AWShqp--