From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E25A7411 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:37:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from geekbox.info (geekbox.info [5.9.151.241]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA4E12E for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (pc-185-201-214-201.cm.vtr.net [201.214.201.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: leo) by geekbox.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5A99DE0A43 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:37:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <55B11825.90700@LeoWandersleb.de> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:36:53 -0300 From: Leo Wandersleb User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: id=FAE4D5168E9EF9F104AA1B2D6B9A1F0CB7C20812 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0sxK7gNAVdqP3KVcXG3QwVU5sUjNt3so0" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Node Speed Test X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:37:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --0sxK7gNAVdqP3KVcXG3QwVU5sUjNt3so0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you a lot for doing this test! Two questions: 1) A node is typically connected to many nodes that would all in parallel= download said block. In your test you measured how fast new blocks that presumably are being uploaded in parallel to all those other nodes are be= ing uploaded? Or did you download blocks while those nodes were basically idl= e? 2) What is your percentage of the very slow connections? On 07/23/2015 11:19 AM, slurms--- via bitcoin-dev wrote: > On this day, the Bitcoin network was crawled and reachable nodes survey= ed to find their maximum throughput in order to determine if it can safel= y support a faster block rate. Specifically this is an attempt to prove o= r disprove the common statement that 1MB blocks were only suitable slower= internet connections in 2009 when Bitcoin launched, and that connection = speeds have improved to the point of obviously supporting larger blocks. > > > The testing methodology is as follows: > > * Nodes were randomly selected from a peers.dat, 5% of the reachable n= odes in the network were contacted. > > * A random selection of blocks was downloaded from each peer. > > * There is some bias towards higher connection speeds, very slow conne= ctions (<30KB/s) timed out in order to run the test at a reasonable rate.= > > * The connecting node was in Amsterdam with a 1GB NIC.=20 > > =20 > Results: > > * 37% of connected nodes failed to upload blocks faster than 1MB/s. > > * 16% of connected nodes uploaded blocks faster than 10MB/s. > > * Raw data, one line per connected node, kilobytes per second http://p= astebin.com/raw.php?i=3D6b4NuiVQ > > > This does not support the theory that the network has the available ban= dwidth for increased block sizes, as in its current state 37% of nodes wo= uld fail to upload a 20MB block to a single peer in under 20 seconds (ref= erencing a number quoted by Gavin). If the bar for suitability is placed = at taking only 1% of the block time (6 seconds) to upload one block to on= e peer, then 69% of the network fails for 20MB blocks. For comparison, on= ly 10% fail this metric for 1MB blocks. > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev --0sxK7gNAVdqP3KVcXG3QwVU5sUjNt3so0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVsRglAAoJEGuaHwy3wggS6qkIAJh7xucvjgcuXklCr0uUxXr9 WKJRYA3fVarsISVxTSSKFMQb7jg2XX1+j8NIEv2L2hcitajiHj0Nc5oJQEjNyMdh FPHXlmTgTU69KqugtiYy/SHK1YYvJsBzD+/OI09G3ugoWLGEOh5iD96y8jrIoVwc sQiWgvkm7fpy2oI/S8WOTinwf+I7qSkNTycQVZvWtaHBFm5BnAMeh7T8964hYRZt 0iZtLfFx5PTpBg/ALhqJN124KDEKijMa17ICRYqLGOp4xjH9UGXPn4H4zH2l82o9 oCcFas5REZYlg6mHjQvPG3x24ieMwn+nI2XcY7W7mYslXyULDAS7em1Ooz9PWBI= =mg7R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0sxK7gNAVdqP3KVcXG3QwVU5sUjNt3so0--