From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D92499 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:22:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com (mail-pd0-f171.google.com [209.85.192.171]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 584FB254 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdrg1 with SMTP id g1so15205872pdr.2 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:22:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eKajGs9yfAFrzb6R3q9niiwaoeTwxPw3a2rtR9vy5yM=; b=BuGagdbhW1XVkGdbV1rH7C1ZyICGeE8Dnf8Q8gdSXkpZrEWXUAhfDbAbITokNqfpvQ Zgc/AazUi3i0Sz6KRqSk+qu5TTz7I67t4fpGmW9aTfDcxRVKruzGk+5rd2m5zPeeWGPr eFENhotOBtwyamOVzPXFzoKe6+Tzq/h4k9vaIyYp6H8A17yEz7vu0AwMmo9/Ku3b6Msw SR2xxeLM3cOjJEj/aipCY6k/wKdfCAn/S1F8aJKIQdxhHhImVTwc1iBhIKjVtZIHw5OP 5DmP9WkQqVXaIPij3f3XaEqJR4/L4GWHYnkblQjiRL/Bkcr8WNHqO0VoE5RPgfcn58hl PusQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkRRlX5E0MkSYPczS6a4P/j0YqW10cHKL+fe3yxMrlT7039tqXuVAjDzT02tC1hU7ry6wtZ X-Received: by 10.66.147.131 with SMTP id tk3mr32675707pab.104.1437751371884; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.13] (c-24-5-43-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.43.190]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id np15sm15197722pdb.1.2015.07.24.08.22.45 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:22:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55B25844.6020801@bitcartel.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:22:44 -0700 From: Simon Liu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Roadmap 2015, or "If We Do Nothing" Analysis X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:22:52 -0000 Would a 1MB increase to 2MB, as outlined in BIP 102, be considered a "modest" increase? On 07/24/2015 07:09 AM, Adam Back via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I am > optimistic that within a year Bitcoin scaling and decentralisation > will look much better with current active work on decentralisation, > layer 2 scaling solutions. As part of that I could see a modest > blocksize increase to smooth out the transition to layer 2.