From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE42279 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 03:47:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.help.org (mail.help.org [70.90.2.18]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38A8AEC for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 03:47:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.10.25] (B [10.1.10.25]) by mail.help.org with ESMTPA ; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 23:46:53 -0400 To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <1B7F00D3-41AE-44BF-818D-EC4EF279DC11@gmail.com> <35B780B8-7282-4C98-9A0D-C7774028E277@gmail.com> <4F7FB1A0-E201-40F2-80BA-4C8D6ECC4DC4@gmail.com> <241A813C-91DC-4A66-AC55-BA8F256E9A9B@gmail.com> From: Milly Bitcoin Message-ID: <55B84CAF.9020601@bitcoins.info> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 23:46:55 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <241A813C-91DC-4A66-AC55-BA8F256E9A9B@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't temporary X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 03:47:04 -0000 > GUYS, WE’VE KNOWN ABOUT THESE PROBLEMS AND HAVE TALKED ABOUT THEM FOR > YEARS ALREADY…AND IT SEEMS PRACTICALLY NOTHING HAS HAPPENED… What is the incentive for someone with high level technical skills to spend all their time developing and testing code? Especially since the code is generally the boring task of "fixing the plumbing" and won't benefit the developer directly ... except they will be blamed if something goes wrong. Russ