From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Another block size limit solution - dynamic block size limit.
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:02:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BAD726.8070200@thinlink.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABK8tmUd+RqTP=vteoX0UEwbzG-X=N3GWvUkD2g5q2suQNpx2w@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/30/2015 8:03 AM, Максим Божко via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I propose to implement dynamic block size limit. Its short summary is
> here in doc:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ixt0loN7LOF6M_2HXvV0D-3ZCayvcfj0rzVm-h-6ONg/edit
>
>
A dynamic limit based on recent block sizes has been discussed, but with
all the traffic on the list, finding the discussions is bound to be
difficult.
I think the main reason this kind of thing hasn't gotten traction is
that it would allow miners alone to chart the course of block sizes.
Miners are likely to have more powerful equipment than everybody else,
and with the current network design, that could reduce the population of
nodes able to keep up, with no limit in the loss of decentralization.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-31 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-30 15:03 [bitcoin-dev] Another block size limit solution - dynamic block size limit Максим Божко
2015-07-31 2:02 ` Tom Harding [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55BAD726.8070200@thinlink.com \
--to=tomh@thinlink.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox