From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D73E4267 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:29:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.bihthai.net (unknown [5.255.87.165]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2A80163 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.8.0.6] (unknown [10.8.0.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: venzen) by mail.bihthai.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E576A20CC6; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:30:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <55BB9438.3030309@mail.bihthai.net> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:28:56 +0700 From: Venzen Khaosan Reply-To: venzen@mail.bihthai.net Organization: Bihthai Bai Mai User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Hearn , Bitcoin Dev References: In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: id=1CF07D66; url=pool.sks-keyservers.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM, RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Block size following technological growth X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:29:03 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/31/2015 09:58 PM, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev wrote: > How more users or more nodes can bring more miners, or more > importantly, improve mining decentralization? > > > Because the bigger the ecosystem is the more interest there is in > taking part? The logic just flows from one to the other does it? So because Islam is the biggest religious ecosystem in the world now you and me are just burning to take part? By your logic, most people in Asia would horde (or want to pay using) Chinese Yuan, only they don't. The Yuan and the Yen are the dominant currencies of large transaction settlement in the region, but try to use it on the street and you're met with puzzled bemusement, Mike Hearn. Bitcoin is not suitable as a currency for pervasive dominance, and ideals of pushing it into every heart and mind around the globe is no different from religious zealotry. Bitcoin has its place and we're only at the beginning of a gradual evolution. How can I say that? Because I'm looking across the rice paddy to where my neighbors have not adopted the innovation of the lightbulb, and burn candles for light and cook with gas. And they're not an anomaly around here or in Asia, Africa and South America. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVu5QvAAoJEGwAhlQc8H1m1DQH/i54c+ZBnk9tZK+0PfC2G0rT taLpqvmXGOHPaSqkfHOLjLOm9LxGAw3TZpFIkFSuSuiSlwDfii2VIlKsbYSCEbBe twCaZuNqam4r+61755ADrvPziPx3Tr2GXN7Zc635prN9uGoGCu58xxc7Iy8sTsrf vB430ZN5RhagpFG5LCqN4QmDGQlK+ceYh53jLQ5HpNP/8UsOJjGXdnZfb4V24EFW 0NPAWdmWVFVpEPxqbsmAGjzOPVdocSQuRTekOQHJ7e5XNmHaD3YGHI+hwBDKzcD+ tUuFh7v4C684172PwandfJGAtUJMeavdh+IA21fze3+trrcTOVOZMHr+HEfmWGs= =AToN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----