From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B48410BD for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 07:44:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC77A1C1 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 07:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from piha.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.162]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1A9C1B79; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 00:44:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1440920660; bh=BKNw5QlCNSZMQuHUZBBC1PUsUoQ6YOLDd98ZuzVQzZo=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EKou4+yAAxDstbq36TzMKc0K1qd7g0r3XV8brQgij7iKbnEHx66jzj5+cNWbGM5FT vPo14/9zAE9y/+jJ/zyVX1v3ho3Q58DF7kC8KloBTggo+lZAYN7cybqd8MiNfU7OaS RmWs+QI/8jEIVc2MNRmibKiYmIADlcbiGsS2ap88= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: odinn.cyberguerrilla) with ESMTPSA id C8F571418D9 Message-ID: <55E2B452.3090402@riseup.net> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 00:44:18 -0700 From: odinn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Decker , Jeff Garzik References: <55D6B653.6050108@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx1.riseup.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Nicolas Dorier , Bitcoin development mailing list Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] RE : Visualizations of Votes X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 07:44:21 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is looking very good also (you've already seen it, but just adding it to thread): https://data.bitcoinity.org/bitcoin/block_size_votes/7d?c=block_size_vot es&r=hour&t=bar (site by Kacper Cieśla (comboy)) On 08/25/2015 01:46 AM, Christian Decker wrote: > Yes, the two dimensions are orthogonal: BIP 100 support and actual > size voting. However there seem to be a few pools which simply vote > to support BIP100, without specifying a desired block size [1], > hence I started tracking both on the same chart, maybe I'll split > them into different charts to clarify. > > Regards, Chris > > [1] > https://blockchain.info/tx/ba1e5d21a340772d637ee5dc0bde8072ad1a7b499ba 241d5bfaae9618749531e > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:46 PM Jeff Garzik > wrote: > > There is a duplicated column. > > BIP 100 voting is /BV\d+/ > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Christian Decker via bitcoin-dev > > wrote: > > I hacked together a simple tracking page for the 'block votes', it > currently includes the 8MB vote and XT, as well as the /BV\d+/ vote > for generic size: http://bitcoinstats.com/network/votes/ > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:25 AM odinn via bitcoin-dev > > wrote: > > Hello Nicolas, > > On 08/20/2015 08:49 PM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev wrote: >>> A visualization I would like to see would include: > >>> pie graph(s) of what % are voting for (BIP 100, BIP 101, > 8MB, BIP >>> sipa >> etc) based on what's published in blocks. > >> If such a vote existed, I would gladly show the pie on > BIPxDevs. >> However there is no standard way for miners to vote > informally BIP >> they support. > > What about formal votes? Is there a way to visually have them > appear in a pie chart as the votes become apparent in blocks? > > I appreciate good visualizations and am trying to get a (visual) > comparison of the votes on these competing proposals. > > > > >> _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing >> list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > > _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing > list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > > _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing > list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > - -- http://abis.io ~ "a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good" https://keybase.io/odinn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV4rRSAAoJEGxwq/inSG8C7gIIALRgWbwf447+B202oUOmtGW6 1CVBJX415PyOmBLqbKBgIRLhQm3rOa0WRcjYejHM2PJLz2XIAyLouOoxiy+rcwX4 yIqEX33El+evgDpFZPjHUYq15mMtP0+jnzwZvyYrCP41m1MUoXwOWDYnf8X+q4yb h2eiApU4fRJmzDYWWzVmoWTYFEzjmNW95vSOTSCFxuvx2A6227vyJI1irQ9EDi7+ UVdvNqTIXTmNDDJBmIsUeWkSe7fAkgyejxD2S08zEUuLR8w3S+9JYJ0rDTMkl4PR EEnuL1M34WMuT7uQIjeQ/5L3voMefKAjCcwiX/lvk2G+YKXXhQhqNy1uyPfJgyI= =YUJa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----