From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B67A61BB for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 21:10:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (mail-pa0-f47.google.com [209.85.220.47]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C7EB106 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 21:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pacdd16 with SMTP id dd16so116362096pac.2 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:10:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=PwagYQlgJIetLSq3oH/XV8HkRT7gcNoQfCENqNFZWvQ=; b=mF1FjaV4Y8KYD3jv3QTMVF5sJXxRQaHsDoEC/uG+l8bsSvAsuQm8wdz6yxfcI67enM e9Gp3UKhNJ+u1qaPQOZ43K/oZ6vCJYMK65Pm4lRgr3wyKaDwCe4RcqqQBUWTSeNGF/gf 4E+cIlXsSb5btT7JWUJOWGFNat4do6DJx4aT5YShAj7HnUFnuK3f+kG+q8Ea5Ir+hfQJ AyUMYOCpom/aH2nUlTt9xSNT3CoiN+TgxhUEROGwelusreC5HkOUv3vUjjLDaYKTTPXj nd3+ZSLVwLIQWe8Ntlv3vVbArvQuP6RIC+USMLg68RHnPkQXv36o5RnxvKi8XgZcUTVC 2alA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmy9Uaqbvys5gRRDVCOUlCTkhVOSfVGdMn0MMsD2eTJ0izTOsBCXC4w8ADc3jZAFzAmtzjV X-Received: by 10.66.227.98 with SMTP id rz2mr32933609pac.16.1440969015994; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net. [99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id fh10sm12145663pdb.95.2015.08.30.14.10.14 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:10:15 -0700 (PDT) To: Peter R References: From: Tom Harding X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55E3713A.5040000@thinlink.com> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:10:18 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000400060907080408030104" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Daniele Pinna Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unlimited Max Blocksize (reprise) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 21:10:16 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000400060907080408030104 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/30/2015 9:54 AM, Peter R wrote: > Like Daniele pointed out, the greedy algorithm assumed in the paper is > asymptotically optimal in such a case. I'm convinced. --------------000400060907080408030104 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/30/2015 9:54 AM, Peter R wrote:
Like Daniele pointed out, the greedy algorithm assumed in the paper is asymptotically optimal in such a case.

I'm convinced.

--------------000400060907080408030104--