From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7D46151C for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 15:31:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com (mail-pa0-f43.google.com [209.85.220.43]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80C0A238 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 15:31:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pacex6 with SMTP id ex6so76851373pac.0 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 08:31:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tTa7ZlH9iROgpXyP69LErVba++dRHFpPS8EhpNGwHjo=; b=OGtKn6yqPd4p09ux/XYU7H3vDWH5ttwFVKnNr0RV3KFiU+bTOQMbZnAGrJsSaF5osg GdMPFjiau9MdtCoFilreDr6b9KTGoLzpJZOmTArjT9DkFVwPqg9kPR1/9uUgSbcvpBgf elEeXRurIEzHoLakDmjq1haFu+g34FR/TfTcv+n+hbE/m2NP65ETkQslAj5UQfMq2FU6 Q4Tt5hELo3/VmIFyJCi3Q1kXTtVli5WHlOUBE79w7wYBgX47Ozc/AOKuXbKlYNUEMKPx i6tq29USiLF4Rs+LgEhiE9IHyaUjqCi9rNpoMjhfOpnowRVi/3yOAzNWVGukv0lZC5tb tWRA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk+Mc0GzCDTpewZmjAhjLiWum0yI4VFgYzt2T3zb/s1gJDl83E37958K69S7PjHeNOkwWTt X-Received: by 10.66.229.67 with SMTP id so3mr14107594pac.66.1442676698272; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 08:31:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net. [99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id fd9sm15157921pab.34.2015.09.19.08.31.37 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 19 Sep 2015 08:31:37 -0700 (PDT) To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <014345a983eabf243d9ce127de0dff7c@xbt.hk> From: Tom Harding Message-ID: <55FD7FDA.1010808@thinlink.com> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 08:31:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <014345a983eabf243d9ce127de0dff7c@xbt.hk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fill-or-kill transaction X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 15:31:38 -0000 On 9/17/2015 8:27 PM, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev wrote: > However, requiring 100 block maturity will unfortunately make the > system much less appealing since the recipient may not like it. The maturity requirement can be dropped if the expiration height is more that 100 blocks after inclusion height.