From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D2A113DC for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 20:54:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.help.org (mail.help.org [70.90.2.18]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80FB32C3 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 20:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.10.25] (B [10.1.10.25]) by mail.help.org with ESMTPA ; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:54:27 -0400 To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <55F9E47D.50507@mattcorallo.com> <55FC6EBF.9090504@mattcorallo.com> <20150919014710.GD22598@muck> <20150919060639.A775A404B9@smtp.hushmail.com> <55FD0737.1080008@voskuil.org> <20150919072714.D3349404B9@smtp.hushmail.com> <55FD1122.5030107@voskuil.org> <20150919075758.820CC404B9@smtp.hushmail.com> <55FD225B.1050402@voskuil.org> <55FDD951.9010709@gmail.com> <20150920162140.8B00D404BA@smtp.hushmail.com> <55FEE015.6000506@bitcoins.info> From: Milly Bitcoin Message-ID: <55FF1D06.7000301@bitcoins.info> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:54:30 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Scaling Bitcoin conference micro-report X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 20:54:35 -0000 Your reply has nothing to do with my comment. It looks like you just go around posting wing nut stuff without regard to what is being discussed. A proper threat model considers all possible threats and looks at the probability of each. Obviously from your comment you have no experience in threat models and limited education in general. Russ On 9/20/2015 4:23 PM, Steven Pine wrote: > It's amazing how foolish some people are to continue trusting > governments especially in light of recent history: a seemingly endless, > Orwellian 'war on terror', multiple regional conflicts often justified > by fake evidence, wholesale disregard of law and basic human covenants > such as do not torture, ubiquitous and secret global surveillance. > > Anyone who doesn't consider governments the proper threat model is > either a shill or an idiot. > > On Sep 20, 2015 12:34 PM, "Milly Bitcoin via bitcoin-dev" > > wrote: > > Until this is settled, Bitcoin has no clear direction and > developers cannot make effective decisions: > > > How exactly do things set "settled" in this environment? > > People looking at Bitcoin think a small group of developers and > miners "control" these decisions. Not sure if "control" is the > right word but that is the perception. > > Russ > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >