From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB13B1C12 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:23:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com [209.85.220.45]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C51779 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pablk4 with SMTP id lk4so75596763pab.3 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 07:23:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VaWa4G72UWiePYSqS9WkJN7X4Nky/4xwvKieAxuzFjg=; b=gMizhYZDyrtgUJ4LajfEANs/R5uuiGH4WyCyOzuJAGqr6qevzMhlOngUaPs1s7f4yd JpDqvDbE/+4MThuijrKOH2pC1/4kh+wX6zKjaAmrtCjVW53tDluI5fJo8YjYqnmKGujk CgtGZEIVyc3vIusTVgOGD1ARyPULAlK+Q6xIbYTsJg+OaAfmzWRAgqfbi0ZYCBb4R+pT PlrqJLAYz4j/x2417s8VOhu6nHzt9qb0EBwy4UkWo4RWzQzTPbsx6YiR+XUEnabLURUQ W4m5GlDoJ24Hs4fM8UPlE4MckICtOjKZ5q4rSSCTJw06VF++i9JjHYn3d8qAiXNPZhVk c3OA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmsCX4J1oUeN3+UhUwO4AcnEVhVRFzlhImkuM4wobiBjE6s9m9ISvtwXSHFFUwjoOLMqOYU X-Received: by 10.66.147.38 with SMTP id th6mr12543706pab.94.1443709419968; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 07:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net. [99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id xm9sm7055344pbc.32.2015.10.01.07.23.38 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 01 Oct 2015 07:23:39 -0700 (PDT) To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org> From: Tom Harding X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <560D41EB.7040902@thinlink.com> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:23:39 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY! X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:23:40 -0000 On 9/30/2015 10:58 AM, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I don't think we need to wait for you to understand the advantages of > softforks to move forward with BIP65, just like we didn't need to wait > for every developer and user to understand BIP66 to deploy it. What a bad example. BIP66 deployment failed, and was rescued by centralized intervention.