From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F611207F for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 01:37:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com (mail-pa0-f52.google.com [209.85.220.52]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B834411D for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 01:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by padhy16 with SMTP id hy16so52830008pad.1 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:37:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yTCTfPUbMJm0VXN1EbPrHuozVG3f60KEc37nPzPmZvE=; b=aoTK3hVMohLa3gd7LjBEvdNsAAFehdkVp3VX8OKWe3O1usd7VQGVilnZOOYCcIO7RO QWcFOElvOzYxj2cOCVf7Ep32SEe4pNYl+KssdvW9c8bgnc6DP+HKGcO8vwIyVK28pKUN 20JhTLs1yGRPsMXvy3Ciuf7BBbgizPCycqErC4+HO+hdvIKLwTWiXMErRUxyBZ/ea6rN xl9R0SSpc+XovmISJ3JUr1dfgDFpbzQfP4dDDlbms+MGshZArlj+UZZ6Rt1GBq0LvyJK B8mN97lZ28vAbscVTznRy/uwNneV5zULNW5W0xcrLH4tk4+S8qOMIAYKTYBCF5HKIHg+ pe0A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlP27Y5sLsw2crZ3ag+c4g7H2bcTHJzAY2GjMPQDNsTuf0v6Y8YPCYaeM//OpXSy2rrAZt0 X-Received: by 10.67.3.167 with SMTP id bx7mr43730308pad.47.1444095440461; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:37:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net. [99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id yg2sm29900463pbb.79.2015.10.05.18.37.19 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:37:19 -0700 (PDT) To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <1489086.kGfJeeyi4a@garp> <2081461.sDX5ARzIdv@garp> From: Tom Harding X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <561325D4.5030800@thinlink.com> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 18:37:24 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard fork technical debate X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 01:37:21 -0000 On 10/5/2015 1:56 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev wrote: > In this case, I don't even believe we have any regulator contributors > that disagree. Since Gavin Andresen chose you to be one of 4 people who decides whose contributions are accepted to the Core project, shouldn't you recuse yourself from referencing "regular contributor" as some kind of bar to an opinion being worthy? You don't want to be accused of squelching a person's opinions by nacking or sitting on commits, then turning around and branding those opinions as worthless because they are not from a "regular contributor." Do you?