[bitcoin-dev] Public Debate Challenge

[bitcoin-dev] Public Debate Challenge

[Venzen Khaosan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mike Hearn,

I challenge you to a public debate with the following conditions:

- - the topic is Bitcoin
- - 15 minutes in length (19mins including breaks)
- - 3 sessions of 5 minutes each
- - each speaker makes one statement in each session, not exceeding 2mins
- - 2 minute breaks between sessions
- - we agree to an arbiter
- - a public venue with an international audience
- - I make the first statement versus your already well-established
position and widely publicized views.
- - each speaker commits to making 3 statements and participating in the
full duration of the event - 19 minutes
- - the footage will be published as-is with no editing or right to
forfeiture, showing both participants at all times.
- - to protect myself from your "official" friends, the event will be
unannounced and will start when you see me on an event panel.

sincerely,
Venzen Khaosan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWFPGuAAoJEGwAhlQc8H1m/6kH/RBdbnuVa/GwKDwgEJbz6p0W
1OKu51Td/IC9Ty5DRhD8is0tzgPtGdJ9I6BFfd548Nhj954YnHE/sKP5XSa75jke
3ombYCWPILrhk64XzIqBfpunygoERKDOUe1r8MmiSdtWY5XHWNEIWxhmydT2GCdZ
DRO3bMKVxBBGhGROxzh2fHHPQ6N2qSmWPRD6QEHMeTvNlN3YN1NyHYiblYZ+Ox8X
1fvemS7ecWhFRovDimiCxMX5yQQCTBSTWbBvyabkyyWUV3p3qgGk8mt+D7rFlLtt
1KnoY6kerW738E5Nd10xMZ5ifeyiD4wATvijLJ0CIa05kiuy0DkaaDYpd28J9tM=
=Qcvl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Public Debate Challenge

[Venzen Khaosan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sure, and I share your view - I want to know what is happening in the
Bitcoin development space when I scan this email account.

Unfortunately, one moral imbecile keeps polluting this space.

I am confident that I have the debating resources and mental savvy to
show this individual to be an intellectual lightweight and a bankrupt
speaker that should shut his mouth, for good, in this list.

I'm not sure where your own allegiances lie, but if you think XT is a
bright idea, you can go there and participate to your heart's content.
In the meantime, this is a Bitcoin Core developer list and
self-proclaimed enemies of Core should not post here or pretend to
have consensus-blocking powers, as O'Hearn keeps capitulating.

Let me put this aspiring lord in his place and then we talk again. I
will knock him down in round 1 and knock him out in round 3. If you
love this man, go to xt-dev list and enjoy and spend your coins in
that alternate chain.

Venzen Khaosan



On 10/07/2015 05:26 PM, Patrick Mccorry (PGR) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I do not mean to be rude (I am sure you have the best intentions). 
> But I do not think this e-mail (or the others) are appropriate for 
> the mailing list. I want to be notified by new developments in the 
> community, not really about public debates of character. Please, 
> can these e-mails be kept off-list?
> 
> Paddy
> 
> ________________________________________ From: 
> bitcoin-dev-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org 
> <bitcoin-dev-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org> on behalf of
> Venzen Khaosan via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> Sent: 07 October 2015 11:19
> To: Mike Hearn; Bitcoin Dev Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Public Debate
> Challenge
> 
> Mike Hearn,
> 
> I challenge you to a public debate with the following conditions:
> 
> - the topic is Bitcoin - 15 minutes in length (19mins including 
> breaks) - 3 sessions of 5 minutes each - each speaker makes one 
> statement in each session, not exceeding 2mins - 2 minute breaks 
> between sessions - we agree to an arbiter - a public venue with an 
> international audience - I make the first statement versus your 
> already well-established position and widely publicized views. - 
> each speaker commits to making 3 statements and participating in 
> the full duration of the event - 19 minutes - the footage will be 
> published as-is with no editing or right to forfeiture, showing 
> both participants at all times. - to protect myself from your 
> "official" friends, the event will be unannounced and will start 
> when you see me on an event panel.
> 
> sincerely, Venzen Khaosan 
> _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev
> mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org 
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWFPZRAAoJEGwAhlQc8H1mKkUH/jAYVoTMT7OW0bg2dquYBmiF
pNbO5oaqO1F3QGLqlLs/S8h/rxkY0tfaae86HEZ/fVNn9r2k6aykmrrztAZdgOT+
p9a7Po/kdd5BPoJ1F84cTxaAiMtl7y8oPyT/np7Ky+Nnyxs2di5eKdV3UK4gKzpt
6xsCR16CinGC8LPveCkGHNgqlk0Of4sNpnkhW945oO2nJzVB3TogvhJQvecZ3hw9
MzIxj59lXI8EL9qhkE0Ufaia1fHfRorCU0qt7mAOxHaZt4Wy3CpgGqrrRGsqXdud
KC3xePRpCaRmLqyUQVXjXdlvANMnXje5dTg9LH0Gseuhb26RGfq7Z3lQ+3kacVo=
=gHMy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Public Debate Challenge

[NxtChg]

>Unfortunately, one moral imbecile keeps polluting this space.

Indeed.

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Public Debate Challenge

[Peter Todd]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 340 bytes --]

On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 05:19:29PM +0700, Venzen Khaosan via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Mike Hearn,
> 
> I challenge you to a public debate with the following conditions:

This is very off-topic for a development mailing list.

Go away.

-- 
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000010734953ce486a820b6f7907e879b1b6e30fccf603098bef

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 650 bytes --]

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Public Debate Challenge

[NotMike Hearn]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1443 bytes --]

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 05:19:29PM +0700, Venzen Khaosan via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > Mike Hearn,
> >
> > I challenge you to a public debate with the following conditions:
>
> This is very off-topic for a development mailing list.
>


I disagree.

Therefore, we do not have a consensus.

As there is no consensus, you need to do one of two things:

1) Post a 10 page, 5 paragraph persuasive essay about how you are a Traitor
to Consensus, and do it
loudly on Reddit, MySpace, LinkedIn, etc, so that everyone in the community
is correctly informed.

2) Do nothing.

This is a very logical argument and is of the utmost seriousness, as what
Peter[:-1] is doing is a threat
to Consensus, which is the very foundation of Bitcoin. These are related
issues.

I question Peter[:-1]'s motives and hereby challenge him to a public debate
with the following conditions:

- - The subject is Bitcoin.
- - The debate may take place at any time at any place.
- - You will not know that the debate has begun until it is over.

Sincerely,
NMH


>
> Go away.
>
> --
> 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> 000000000000000010734953ce486a820b6f7907e879b1b6e30fccf603098bef
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3007 bytes --]