From: Peter Tschipper <peter.tschipper@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] further test results for : "Datastream Compression of Blocks and Tx's"
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 21:15:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <565A89F4.6070706@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <725E6BCC-E839-4F91-9BCA-95D0549DC3C7@toom.im>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 959 bytes --]
yes, you're right, it's just the percentage compressed (size reduction)
On 28/11/2015 4:30 PM, Jonathan Toomim wrote:
> It appears you're using the term "compression ratio" to mean "size
> reduction". A compression ratio is the ratio (compressed /
> uncompressed). A 1 kB file compressed with a 10% compression ratio
> would be 0.1 kB. It seems you're using (1 - compressed/uncompressed),
> meaning that the compressed file would be 0.9 kB.
>
> On Nov 28, 2015, at 6:48 AM, Peter Tschipper via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
>
>> The following show the compression ratio acheived for various sizes
>> of data. Zlib is the clear
>> winner for compressibility, with LZOx-999 coming close but at a cost.
>>
>> range Zlib-1 cmp%
>> Zlib-6 cmp% LZOx-1 cmp% LZOx-999 cmp%
>> 0-250b 12.44 12.86 10.79 14.34
>> 250-500b 19.33 12.97 10.34 11.11
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4850 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-29 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-09 19:18 [bitcoin-dev] request BIP number for: "Support for Datastream Compression" Peter Tschipper
2015-11-09 20:41 ` Johnathan Corgan
2015-11-09 21:04 ` Bob McElrath
2015-11-10 1:58 ` gladoscc
2015-11-10 5:40 ` Johnathan Corgan
2015-11-10 9:44 ` Tier Nolan
[not found] ` <5642172C.701@gmail.com>
2015-11-10 16:17 ` Peter Tschipper
2015-11-10 16:21 ` Jonathan Toomim
2015-11-10 16:30 ` Tier Nolan
2015-11-10 16:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2015-11-10 17:09 ` Peter Tschipper
2015-11-11 18:35 ` Peter Tschipper
2015-11-11 18:49 ` Marco Pontello
2015-11-11 19:05 ` Jonathan Toomim
2015-11-13 21:58 ` [bitcoin-dev] Block Compression (Datastream Compression) test results using the PR#6973 compression prototype Peter Tschipper
2015-11-18 14:00 ` [bitcoin-dev] More findings: " Peter Tschipper
2015-11-11 19:11 ` [bitcoin-dev] request BIP number for: "Support for Datastream Compression" Peter Tschipper
2015-11-28 14:48 ` [bitcoin-dev] further test results for : "Datastream Compression of Blocks and Tx's" Peter Tschipper
2015-11-29 0:30 ` Jonathan Toomim
2015-11-29 5:15 ` Peter Tschipper [this message]
[not found] ` <56421F1E.4050302@gmail.com>
2015-11-10 16:46 ` [bitcoin-dev] request BIP number for: "Support for Datastream Compression" Peter Tschipper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=565A89F4.6070706@gmail.com \
--to=peter.tschipper@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox