From: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release candidate 1 available
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 17:12:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A64951.7040405@jonasschnelli.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2A118822-6550-4042-9229-1D213B6FE615@coingyft.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
> Why is the minimum storage quota of 550 MiB necessary for pruning
> nodes if the block data is not served to other nodes ? Could the
> client just do transaction verification and transaction relaying
> and only keep the block(s) being verified on disk ?
>
We try to allow reorgs ~288 blocks deep also in pruning:
- From code comments:
Require that user allocate at least 550MB for block & undo files
(blk???.dat and rev???.dat)
At 1MB per block, 288 blocks = 288MB.
Add 15% for Undo data = 331MB
Add 20% for Orphan block rate = 397MB
We want the low water mark after pruning to be at least 397 MB and
since we prune in
full block file chunks, we need the high water mark which triggers the
prune to be
one 128MB block file + added 15% undo data = 147MB greater for a total
of 545MB
Setting the target to > than 550MB will make it likely we can respect
the target.
</jonas>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=lDcA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-25 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-17 10:08 [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release candidate 1 available Wladimir J. van der Laan
2016-01-17 22:57 ` xor
2016-01-18 11:14 ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
2016-01-19 6:06 ` xor
2016-01-25 12:03 ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
2016-01-25 12:27 ` xor
2016-01-25 14:44 ` Marco Falke
2016-01-25 15:05 ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
2016-01-25 15:57 ` Simon Selitsky
2016-01-25 16:12 ` Jonas Schnelli [this message]
2016-01-25 17:33 ` xor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56A64951.7040405@jonasschnelli.ch \
--to=dev@jonasschnelli.ch \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox