From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75065EA6 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 19:02:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pf0-f181.google.com (mail-pf0-f181.google.com [209.85.192.181]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23745E1 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 19:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f181.google.com with SMTP id e127so2485192pfe.3 for ; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:02:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:disposition-notification-to :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bv/qT9YXccbhxdwY17oTRndNxlN0hlD1yHs3PzeRpcA=; b=t73pRnsDm7VyryLE8GILLwTF41DOdbJkVlKv2rc1FgCV6e6lxAtp6hVOz11jHTpfqS CBmqF9gmcwhQsYWZvOo2d4n62dcfZiaWLIPuYM3mQh0XELsNoKJGVIrTmT1fwehn8clJ RX0y7oa5woYpCsFjG+uXFSqVoTdeG+zjI4KONU6lxROHAm/tkXXYZA6ks46EZIlU+e44 R0jQccqs9GLwhb1SjsP6S/BXDfXNhqFnwHEX1CR+gBa1424+jnZmtkLhPsOzrp4S6OhX MRsdOk/U5/B2OFlw/JJlK5VDDgeIMx4dI5qvjbCbXfr1DZhSfDreAImjpQKGfOxmRPuX 9GLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id :disposition-notification-to:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bv/qT9YXccbhxdwY17oTRndNxlN0hlD1yHs3PzeRpcA=; b=YhOtDw2mjQa8rIwebAvAKwZhj+CsjdA5J3V/QSgBPwSeZdub08EnTpoiUarptvQx7e uH0Wb4i8ysVZshB4ixxr+7yShYGNdx0Jp/kV6RBR245YyvXtFKcU4Lk53RAWpRR6MT5W RLL996cx9jLIj/8vfcl+2B1s5DB6mgGnpWkNIT7TXDu2nURN/jKxIVuFQic3yLYA4fcP D+bj8/wsqBnfxK082D8Uc5mncGyyAvSJ9lNNVNzLsK5dzDUxzO/Phzys16371WSz5wSA 03EvCmnbM/jOk8U92pt42wGr412B6BlwFGrb8c1RzTGAjrNrjIde1K+JDNxQruf01ckj MDow== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSjE1/Y9vDowzjzvexKSSbYgA9rpsGUwXSlUCli4FStzwdWGa5Z3Q9PDC9F0jBBAg== X-Received: by 10.98.10.149 with SMTP id 21mr36633797pfk.75.1454871755867; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:02:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.45.134.131] (strateman.ninja. [66.175.221.254]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z67sm37954138pfa.71.2016.02.07.11.02.34 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:02:35 -0800 (PST) To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <201602060012.26728.luke@dashjr.org> <7E723AB3-ED80-40CE-B5BD-DD5F69486C16@toom.im> From: Patrick Strateman Message-ID: <56B7951A.2090800@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 11:03:54 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7E723AB3-ED80-40CE-B5BD-DD5F69486C16@toom.im> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 19:11:16 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Increase block size limit to 2 megabytes X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 19:02:36 -0000 I would expect that custodians who fail to produce coins on both sides of a fork in response to depositor requests will find themselves in serious legal trouble. Especially if the price moves against either fork. On 02/07/2016 10:55 AM, Jonathan Toomim via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > On Feb 6, 2016, at 9:21 PM, Jannes Faber via bitcoin-dev > > wrote: > >> They *must* be able to send their customers both coins as separate >> withdrawals. >> > Supporting the obsolete chain is unnecessary. Such support has not > been offered in any cryptocurrency hard fork before, as far as I know. > I do not see why it should start now. >> >> If not, that amounts to theft of their customers funds. >> > If they announce their planned behavior before the fork, I do not see > any ethical or legal issues. > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev