From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B29C256 for ; Sun, 8 May 2016 10:07:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.sldev.cz (mail.sldev.cz [51.254.7.247]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E32D711F for ; Sun, 8 May 2016 10:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E587E5E0; Sun, 8 May 2016 10:08:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sldev.cz Received: from mail.sldev.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gpqH7cISazxW; Sun, 8 May 2016 10:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tetra.site (unknown [10.8.8.107]) by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDA1BE379; Sun, 8 May 2016 10:08:40 +0000 (UTC) To: Marek Palatinus , Pieter Wuille , Pieter Wuille References: <5717AF19.1030102@gmail.com> From: Pavol Rusnak Message-ID: <572F0FF8.50009@satoshilabs.com> Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 12:07:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 08 May 2016 10:56:48 +0000 Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal to update BIP-32 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 10:07:58 -0000 On 21/04/16 14:08, Marek Palatinus via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Sipa, you are probably the most competent to answer this. > Could you please tell us your opinion? For me, this is > straightforward, backward compatible fix and I like it a lot. > Not sure about the process of changing "Final" BIP though. Sipa: Marek told me you posted your answer and he received it, but it never reached the list. Could you please resend after figuring out what went wrong? -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol "stick" Rusnak SatoshiLabs.com