From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stick@satoshilabs.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1681974
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun,  8 May 2016 22:21:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.sldev.cz (mail.sldev.cz [51.254.7.247])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 864D463
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun,  8 May 2016 22:21:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33471E669;
	Sun,  8 May 2016 22:21:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sldev.cz
Received: from mail.sldev.cz ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mail.sl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id Eipc2R3W5GJn; Sun,  8 May 2016 22:21:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tetra.site (unknown [10.8.8.107])
	by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D4C4E668;
	Sun,  8 May 2016 22:21:51 +0000 (UTC)
To: Marek Palatinus <marek@palatinus.cz>, bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <5717AF19.1030102@gmail.com>
	<CAJna-HiG5Nq_c0nZ28bTV4ZQKaU-zY1YiSEEaRK9ZvFO7LH-EA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBiAv7PFWEw5s=BPcOkL-x9GfWqi24pD3xMnfxvz9xQy4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJna-HjiN9-KbVgUVFeaDWeFgQV9o5o_omEV5bh4drEyEALdnw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@satoshilabs.com>
Message-ID: <572FBBCE.3040306@satoshilabs.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 00:21:02 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJna-HjiN9-KbVgUVFeaDWeFgQV9o5o_omEV5bh4drEyEALdnw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 08 May 2016 22:31:05 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: Proposal to update BIP-32
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 22:21:08 -0000

On 08/05/16 15:48, Marek Palatinus via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> unambiguously be used to refer to an idea. My suggestion would be to write
> a new BIP that overrides parts of BIP32, and then put a note in BIP32 that
> a better mechanism is available that is unlikely to change things in
> reality for the secp256k1 curve.

I guess, we'll write that down to SLIP-0032 then.

-- 
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol "stick" Rusnak
SatoshiLabs.com