From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 742F3724 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:47:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from server3 (server3.include7.ch [144.76.194.38]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7760A15F for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by server3 (Postfix, from userid 115) id 6D45F2E60684; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 14:47:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from Jonass-MacBook-Pro-2.local (unknown [213.55.184.206]) by server3 (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90EBE2D00449 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 14:47:35 +0200 (CEST) To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <57A89EA3.4020101@jonasschnelli.ch> <57A8BCD9.7050402@AndySchroder.com> <57A8C76D.1080405@AndySchroder.com> <57A9AA1E.9050302@jonasschnelli.ch> From: Jonas Schnelli Message-ID: <57ADC563.5090107@jonasschnelli.ch> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 14:47:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57A9AA1E.9050302@jonasschnelli.ch> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9tW64LQlBhNlFeuasgUWJIpH68NT7Il60" Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Authentication BIP X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:47:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --9tW64LQlBhNlFeuasgUWJIpH68NT7Il60 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="jv8pKWgG6MkFVrakPNFELj2aVlRQxknC0" From: Jonas Schnelli To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Message-ID: <57ADC563.5090107@jonasschnelli.ch> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Authentication BIP References: <57A89EA3.4020101@jonasschnelli.ch> <57A8BCD9.7050402@AndySchroder.com> <57A8C76D.1080405@AndySchroder.com> <57A9AA1E.9050302@jonasschnelli.ch> In-Reply-To: <57A9AA1E.9050302@jonasschnelli.ch> --jv8pKWgG6MkFVrakPNFELj2aVlRQxknC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Yes. I think this limitation could be removed. > A responding node can have =96 in theory =96 multiple identity-keys per= > network interface (network interfaces is also confusing, because you > could run multiple bitcoind instances on the same interface with > different ports). >=20 > The BIP should just make clear, that it is probably wise, to use > different identity-keys for each network interface (ipv4, v6, tor). >=20 I have updated that part of the BIP ----------- Each peer can configure multiple identity-keys (ECC, 32 bytes). Peers should make sure, each network interface (IPv4, IPv6, tor) has its own identity-key (otherwise it would be possible to link a tor address to a IPvX address). The identity-public-key(s) can be shared over a different channel with other node-operators (or non-validating clients) to grant authorized acce= ss. ----------- https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/compare/master...jonasschnelli:2016/07/au= th_bip?expand=3D1 --jv8pKWgG6MkFVrakPNFELj2aVlRQxknC0-- --9tW64LQlBhNlFeuasgUWJIpH68NT7Il60 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXrcVjAAoJECnUvLZBb1PsiXAQALca3O7LVyEVXq9zvx16HMVV FkzvSwuSDW7/0VL9DryzeKh7t9PlY6278GlhLKU763aghMk/AOzBeOSKSOIH0fcb DKdxI1GPApu2wRPbR4VeP7gJT22gKHO8dhekQH/cOfmeZyw0D9SqutWqZkvX3UVh 1jl+tHyvGngjuuLQAisXmNtC0n40nsULzUpdGcW2S0SDSb5GfTejYY6tpUjlt4Sh drOL0bAgKtibnk2s2K7MO6uYVYtB+OahjrN/dq0BZAugrT2Vq05CtbpUAqo0nd/X Zvm8VXNgR9Wn2Fg9DeXU/fL6IA6p8elHYG6CWtZJ4+ttJz1cpOKBjD80hp0+BwuJ r2rkM2d9oi15YmvupauE18eJtBG7xEMUW0gV2mAAIb7V4SmfCFmn29BZbxuyiTIa Aes3j8+wcShqqfVPlu7iO0gZ5ZVP/xu7MAg3Pxr6Rq2GEOrbdl0NRtktRqNUON28 iDr2KyV7gIohcneNYD4lPajGAyLf6hi/NztBcbzkNDMWew2lfj8aKE1cuL+2FydC y13zuqQDdndWjYfXJNN2RmANwxsedfbCCPqc1GPTOby4tXBZvOmfwb+UwDlcPmog 1m07gSGz1SLs+LdBexVlM+Z4gnuOUwx8JBO3AtTyqajQ1ZmI43dGAOK7TzEzdRok EF5uOBtMk/Sn4HPmuKcb =JNz/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9tW64LQlBhNlFeuasgUWJIpH68NT7Il60--