Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)

[Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 945 bytes --]

On Feb 19, 2015, at 6:22 AM, Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com> wrote:
> I  launched a Lighthouse project to add Java Language Binding to lib consensus. Let's turn the debate to a constructive vote.
> 
> See on https://www.reddit.com/r/LighthouseProjects

I should have added the project description here, as above is only readable with lighthouse:

Java Language Binding for Core Consensus Library

Bitcoin Core 0.10.0 comes with a library for external services that validates Bitcoin transactions with the code base of the core.

The proposed language binding would unleash innovation of JVM application developer without raising concern of a network fork through incompatible alternate implementations of the protocol.

The language binding would be written with lightweight, immutable, self contained data classes that use only language standard libraries, therefore suitable for any service framework.


Tamas Blummer


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 496 bytes --]