From: Michael Gronager <gronager@ceptacle.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Cc: "dev@lists.crypto-stick.org" <dev@lists.crypto-stick.org>,
"bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Hardware BitCoin wallet as part of Google Summer of Code
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:50:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B4F4F35-5FB3-45F9-B7E1-500D01CFA569@ceptacle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130429162839.GA31932@petertodd.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2427 bytes --]
Are you familiar with this:
http://code.google.com/p/opencryptotoken/
It does ecc and as it is based on an atmel micro controller, adding a display is pretty straight forward
Michael
On 29/04/2013, at 18.28, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:30:47PM +0800, Crypto Stick wrote:
>> Crypto Stick is an open source USB key for encryption and secure
>> authentication.
>> We have been accepted as a mentor organization for Google
>> Summer of Code (GSOC) 2013. One of our project ideas is to develop a
>> physical BitCoin wallet according to
>> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Smart_card_wallet
>
> A word of caution: hardware Bitcoin wallets really do need some type of
> display so the wallet itself can tell you where the coins it is signing
> are being sent, and that in turn implies support for the upcoming
> payment protocol so the wallet can also verify that the address is
> actually the address of the recipient the user is intending to send
> funds too. The current Crypto Stick hardware doesn't even have a button
> for user interaction. (press n times to approve an n-BTC spend)
>
> Having said that PGP smart cards and USB keys already have that problem,
> but the consequences of signing the wrong document are usually less than
> the consequences of sending some or even all of the users funds to a
> thief. You can usually revoke a bad signature after the fact with a
> follow-up message.
>
> Not to say hardware security for private keys isn't a bad thing, but the
> protections are a lot more limited than users typically realize.
>
>
> I will say though I am excited that this implies that the Crypto Stick
> could have ECC key support in the future.
>
> --
> 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
> New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service
> that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
> browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
> and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5948 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-29 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-29 14:30 [Bitcoin-development] Hardware BitCoin wallet as part of Google Summer of Code Crypto Stick
2013-04-29 16:28 ` Peter Todd
2013-04-29 16:50 ` Michael Gronager [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5B4F4F35-5FB3-45F9-B7E1-500D01CFA569@ceptacle.com \
--to=gronager@ceptacle.com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=dev@lists.crypto-stick.org \
--cc=pete@petertodd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox