From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA960BDC for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 20:16:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pl1-f170.google.com (mail-pl1-f170.google.com [209.85.214.170]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 682B16C5 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 20:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl1-f170.google.com with SMTP id u12so1653942pls.12 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:16:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=voskuil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=tFDbjabAffOgLhu+MRvOAB/aM2zwePLYEYQVj02PPKQ=; b=d6DNifUCrrDc3nmsYtlJK4GUBBeJJ+m3T3hQ67U2f+BQWA0/PfulJ54s8Tr0VizWWP Rb1yV6Z3aamPfF4BfM1I0LSdUT9DGNiR0nZlpbSCsJIsTJvsQPi0ppBhQQid8jy1Snw6 IV6LCQ9Rx+HyJy71pKN6tfizoLTLM1GG8Mm2lFmAB4SWpcjronp8A6xk8iLuf6Iwbqym hN43TnA+Ai+FGWIk1tgfoBeo0Y0p5z6mBV9H78cvG9SszNcaLQ1QkcmtRResRDAHlqlP 8sK7HH2UiBb4yziBF3Ua920nsP652h1hQMJmPW8A88n6PB1ufKZoEFVnGhOmX8p1lGFw PjmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=tFDbjabAffOgLhu+MRvOAB/aM2zwePLYEYQVj02PPKQ=; b=LZyYLVn6fk+KtFEZl60HNcvHJ4ICjZhyCcJyyB1Aq0aChUYN4xByXuFq+o6/oPSFDF j8Tv09DeIeEud6ISBzPoIke0YoS/rNpL3yHYmJ68FGMRFdeld3/MKC60fQJyk4XstXGP 0GSFIMHEFsjr6FNn1L8hQWItOJHeo1o9mzBJsC1Q8FBH82S3zX9dLehhYYvSdMgzPKJm XyPS4QzcINX+KROUDpgg4EbqNIrBTVDZrnZ+JlvLLyh+cvX45HBfi6fjdbGjpP7arbSh W7esbl32odpVcYp/JYxUk6C896R94F+HhPUzxlB/R38FxmGb+IPAZAJxW2at4dLJWNOy 1dCg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVXhRIOcmvfoHTHDkVjn5p6rkbJVDVtxzV6NCeaKajY1WfDZXjY c2lHRN6NWT7s9jeYzUI7XL69vXFRNsk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxjTFCWrOnxVWX11EmaofivE9bYTrNqTHcCHYgtyRlwCAufDbw/I9uE/LbKEOHxM8ZpqDtx1g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b48c:: with SMTP id y12mr6037560plr.38.1571343409811; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2600:380:8560:bc27:2d74:1b23:773d:eeeb? ([2600:380:8560:bc27:2d74:1b23:773d:eeeb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 202sm3729574pfu.161.2019.10.17.13.16.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Eric Voskuil Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:16:47 -0700 Message-Id: <5C03EE5A-B29E-44BC-903F-7094E504580D@voskuil.org> References: In-Reply-To: To: Andreas Schildbach , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A860) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 21:32:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 20:16:50 -0000 As this is a P2P protocol change it should be exposed as a version increment= (and a BIP), not just as a conditional service. If the intent is to retain t= his protocol indefinitely, exposing it conditionally, then a service bit wou= ld make sense, but it remains a protocol change. BIP61 is explicit: =E2=80=9CAll implementations of the P2P protocol version 70,002 and later sh= ould support the reject message.=E2=80=9C e > On Oct 17, 2019, at 12:54, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn 16/10/2019 18.43, John Newbery via bitcoin-dev wrote: >=20 >> Following discussion on this mailing list, support for BIP 61 REJECT >> messages was not removed from Bitcoin Core in V0.19. The behaviour in >> that upcoming release is that REJECT messages are disabled by default >> and can be enabled using the `-enablebip61` command line option. >=20 > Is there a NODE_* bit we can use to pick peers that support this > (useful!) feature? >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev