From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AA4C0012 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C5760F19 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:11:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cock.li Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JqtbXS5wP32U for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:11:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail.cock.li (mail.cock.li [37.120.193.124]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8CF960669 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:11:00 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cock.li; s=mail; t=1639602652; bh=k6WTEXsKQGP9gmXvGHGU3hcpigCVhqeYwxWH1x8QjLw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FpTjd+paBr23b6nOW51DZqDgzVlgR6qzvDnNnQ9lJVogyA8nkMtSigm19legwbG3Q n8xl1UDiU5kp+yugoMz3fSD6vDr8u/NbCuoa2oKyA3RlVCrhf4wTZxhpZ8Lftuxxiz JmUoYA3lsTRD7dSpolJS96ukYCqnXsdQS1FMYuAT6uKkPyoTMTnP54CXE3sBCww2XN dUP655zTrtwTcU6Hpnoj0LHEVlPrBRpkIboEfAuSmy+04TqZjvbdZO3RSZCDZofpiV UvC6j9i0+PlBKEtClXbUiJHDz+Zt+s00ElX6+0KUm2bSmoEWQwd6fi1AQ+d6B2RRPo BEfHdN79XrXNQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:10:51 +0000 From: yanmaani@cock.li To: Jeremy , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5b87372e0a6a825e2927656a7a5d9cc9@cock.li> X-Sender: yanmaani@cock.li User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.17 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:30:24 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Bitcoin Advent Calendar] Decentralized Coordination Free Mining Pools X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:11:05 -0000 How does this differ from p2pool? If you've just re-invented p2pool, shouldn't you credit their prior art? Monero is doing their implementation of p2pool. They have viable solo mining, as far as I understand. The basic idea is you have several P2pools. If you have a block time of 10 minutes, p2pool has 20% of hashrate, and there's 100 p2pool chains, each chain gets 0.2% of net hash. If you're OK with 20s block times (orphans aren't really a big problem), you need (20/600) * (0.02/100) = 0.00067% of network hash to get a payout every 10m.