From: <damgaard.martin@gmail.com>
To: Karl-Johan Alm <karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Suggestion for a universal bitcoin value scale
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 08:32:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b98b2e7.1c69fb81.2a827.102b@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALJw2w7GZ=MXO8jMdObznqB8RndUjLOSRW-dFcQPsFLXeGsyLQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1558 bytes --]
A very good point. I have realized the immature nature of my suggestion due to this and a number of other good remarks, and will like to retract the initial suggestion.
Thank you and all the best
Martin Damgaard
Fra: Karl-Johan Alm
Sendt: 12. september 2018 08:14
Til: damgaard.martin@gmail.com; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Emne: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Suggestion for a universal bitcoin value scale
A potential problem is that it would be a new attack vector to simply
color something to appear as e.g. 10x more than it really is, if
everyone started using this system.
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 5:27 AM Martin Damgaard via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Hi bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>
> Here is my humble attempt to make a contribution to the impressive work that you all are doing.
>
> I am unfamiliar with the normal BIP procedures. I have therefore just tried to follow the example of BIP 176 by Jimmy Song, in order make something similar. I suggest a universal bitcoin value color scale, for tackling the same decimal problem, as identified by the BIP 176 proposal.
>
> I have attached the document in three different formats (*.rtf, *.pdf and *.docx) as I do not know your preferred format. I hope you will find my suggestion useful.
>
>
>
> Thank you and all the best
>
> Martin Damgaard
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4028 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-12 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-18 20:10 [bitcoin-dev] Suggestion for a universal bitcoin value scale damgaard.martin
2018-08-19 11:42 ` Rodolfo Novak
[not found] ` <CAJS4p67a+47PimeSizBsAb9nanjaOdgB41hDQXoKFj9OxMqMFA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-08-19 14:21 ` damgaard.martin
2018-08-20 23:36 ` rhavar
2018-09-12 6:13 ` Karl-Johan Alm
2018-09-12 6:32 ` damgaard.martin [this message]
2018-09-12 14:54 ` Clark Moody
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b98b2e7.1c69fb81.2a827.102b@mx.google.com \
--to=damgaard.martin@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox