From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 05:58:49 -0700 Received: from mail-yb1-f189.google.com ([209.85.219.189]) by mail.fairlystable.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tuWWu-0001Io-Fa for bitcoindev@gnusha.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 05:58:49 -0700 Received: by mail-yb1-f189.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e5742f52896sf8865766276.3 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 05:58:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20230601; t=1742302723; x=1742907523; darn=gnusha.org; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:x-original-sender:mime-version :subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id:to:from:date:sender:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lE5zZXZf3lUBXTKKb3tnHtUhH/OEncv8sR4K7JP2apI=; b=NXPcevNVYImelDMGvAOSo7hJ2ZTwFERSuirU0DBB9ROKC26n9Vp+Hg6qqG8SclUwnd VrXfPMFYH7y1CatlhnxbfXSOShIDFiHSh3p6wnvvT5YV+Ogxclsc+xVE9d6FRma3Pg+j r1aGzXQsLcREAbD4/CYt/2xPVh5/ih+v6go+q6IntuO/wu7h3YcPwvUmzy8IuavAQLzE TMRCFNZojRRShPJ51fKtGy4ZLIrFoGr0J4bKiThKr+sPo4k2z1YfP1OrEVzg0+iw8Nic vx3ySaznt0yCo+7/Obxrs38AJmJxd6eIAx5U+zmjyyvI/goMZsNrHDlsV3rp42V+YLlg mcgw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1742302723; x=1742907523; darn=gnusha.org; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:x-original-sender:mime-version :subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id:to:from:date:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lE5zZXZf3lUBXTKKb3tnHtUhH/OEncv8sR4K7JP2apI=; b=hgTc+ZAMWx5/zUHZJFMn5kzulXgtvVIzt5QmYPkem0eZIqMYzNoD2H3bli993OXz30 AFEDfbQBs/RShjZSBwiQwljZM7V8pza4rg68mF+4HKJ1ZZOzUEutFfb2ZMyfKIGQhYXR l06HzkjFad9E6J447+XxYVPsa4/uGrf7WbjFcZM+RY8WLnWXT2tkbOkvpVg5B91KuTjA rE4hbecq8Ps3xXbG5+76T4N2fynNjSO8iJANeOURaacRD5n/h1r1vR2+f5I4Qy76KrO9 AIQrDh43MmS9fqgroq/7cxS/x7MEqGD+CdAufbWKmVO/GrSlBgCzYX5irWmEwylzEM9Y HlrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742302723; x=1742907523; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:x-original-sender:mime-version :subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id:to:from:date:x-beenthere :x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=lE5zZXZf3lUBXTKKb3tnHtUhH/OEncv8sR4K7JP2apI=; b=AB7aU6tHpNWBmkNCffR2sqc1TGaIqUP2oW/+44xdh6ANPI9dTm4f3QIRixC5AVp826 1RIwdJwxYO93YW9IKnPDHvkSQAsxPtwkbLNS3BD04KvdqmtPKa31GgK5xolFgqcemB8r vEAfMfgo2ltrQMY6ltQf7Bf/m0+l1e9a487cN7GenrwkgCIZsOn333Q1TTRcMuwid1wX oeLjZSqb546uIqPVPctpq6i/MjjD3+Pi+CdxGELbrk2ZG0qyXPl0vBiIqTWO5+RRPoLV sntOXEp4K+wDcpr9T/BlCSbt5BFgj+qjiBBAgrcXbtDvyLq2kXyUsaflK6hny7f1w5NU uBFw== Sender: bitcoindev@googlegroups.com X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVaIZv8HORJc/B8AXoupGn49Cye8wrW2eOXdd2Qd78x+ADL+pShzYCFo/KgGJDexaXtygiisZzMAlEM@gnusha.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwnJ6lka4SXlzVk/Ti+oo+3Y6lk3RPsOQzI9TfQWi01vsoQUbvg lX/tBKK355VpSAieQbIiXlNljy1QAMoSdQTwvjDa2xGVboJ9Tlkp X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHDpuJYh69NiVcMfyh77HKWtARDw74q4Wd75Fzn5N82u5vpxNUPnUoOu72iY88I6R4eW8JjRA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:4891:b0:e63:6b79:5b03 with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e63f64cfc62mr17902436276.1.1742302722558; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 05:58:42 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bitcoindev@googlegroups.com; h=ARLLPAJck7qPYT+dYyIW2Cf9quWSeyZ7XNElHAJqDytIhpRkhA== Received: by 2002:a25:3d84:0:b0:e60:8883:5aa4 with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e63dc2be29bls1661939276.2.-pod-prod-03-us; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 05:58:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:744a:b0:6ff:1cd7:18e6 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6ffdcdebdddmr47359197b3.37.1742302719241; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 05:58:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 2002:a05:690c:450c:b0:6fb:b341:b6f6 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6ff4548646cms7b3; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 23:55:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:3513:b0:6fd:2fcf:12f5 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6ff460c15cbmr195495747b3.27.1742280904574; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 23:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 23:55:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Weikeng Chen To: Bitcoin Development Mailing List Message-Id: <5f34bdb6-8088-4501-8116-99e2f182b929n@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [bitcoindev] Time to add CSFS to Signet? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_519016_460460156.1742280903623" X-Original-Sender: weikeng.chen@l2iterative.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bitcoindev@googlegroups.com; contact bitcoindev+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 786775582512 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) ------=_Part_519016_460460156.1742280903623 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_519017_674528186.1742280903623" ------=_Part_519017_674528186.1742280903623 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Moonsettler,=20 I can see that LNHANCE has already had a live "mutinynet" working as a=20 functional network for testing. Do you think it is still necessary to add it to the "signet" signet or just= =20 wait until more progress with CTV + CSFS on the bitcoin/bitcoin repository= =20 as PRs and then to testnet? Thanks, Weikeng On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 7:12:09=E2=80=AFAM UTC+8 moonsettler wrote: > Hi Weikeng, > > CSFS is on signet. All the LNhance opcodes are on mutinynet. > https://github.com/lnhance/mutinynet-bitcoin/tree/mutinynet-cat-ln-hance > https://faucet.mutinynet.com/ > > [signet] > > signetchallenge=3D512102f7561d208dd9ae99bf497273e16f389bdbd6c4742ddb8e6b2= 16e64fa2928ad8f51ae > addnode=3D45.79.52.207:38333 > dnsseed=3D0 > signetblocktime=3D30 > > BR, > moonsettler > > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > > On Monday, March 17th, 2025 at 4:38 AM, Weikeng Chen < > weiken...@l2iterative.com> wrote: > > > I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should b= e=20 > added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received a= =20 > lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years,= =20 > CSFS isn't. > > With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHANCE t= o=20 > start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with BitVM= =20 > by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower potential= =20 > on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications relyin= g=20 > on CTV + CSFS to develop further. > >=20 > > Thanks, > > Weikeng > >=20 > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google=20 > Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send= =20 > an email to bitcoindev+...@googlegroups.com. > > To view this discussion visit=20 > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41d= d06b2824n%40googlegroups.com > . > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/= 5f34bdb6-8088-4501-8116-99e2f182b929n%40googlegroups.com. ------=_Part_519017_674528186.1742280903623 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Moonsettler,=C2=A0

I can see that LNHANCE has already = had a live "mutinynet" working as a functional network for testing.
Do you think it is still necessary to add it to the "signet" signet or j= ust wait until more progress with CTV + CSFS on the bitcoin/bitcoin reposit= ory as PRs and then to testnet?

Thanks,
Weikeng

On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 7:12:09=E2=80=AFAM UTC+8 mo= onsettler wrote:
Hi Weikeng,

CSFS is on signet. All the LNhance opcodes are on mutinynet.
https://github.com/lnhanc= e/mutinynet-bitcoin/tree/mutinynet-cat-ln-hance
https://faucet.mutinynet.com/

[signet]
signetchallenge=3D512102f7561d208dd9ae99bf497273e16f389bdbd6c4742ddb8e6= b216e64fa2928ad8f51ae
addnode=3D45.79.52.207:38333
dnsseed=3D0
signetblocktime=3D30

BR,
moonsettler


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

On Monday, March 17th, 2025 at 4:38 AM, Weikeng Chen <weiken...@l2iterative.com> wrote:

> I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS= should be added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently r= eceived a lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few= years, CSFS isn't.
> With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHA= NCE to start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with = BitVM by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower poten= tial on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications rel= ying on CTV + CSFS to develop further.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Weikeng
>=20
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google= Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, = send an email to bitcoindev+...@= googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit https= ://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b282= 4n%40googlegroups.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bitcoind= ev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoind= ev/5f34bdb6-8088-4501-8116-99e2f182b929n%40googlegroups.com.
------=_Part_519017_674528186.1742280903623-- ------=_Part_519016_460460156.1742280903623--