From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B168CFD for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 15:33:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qk0-f169.google.com (mail-qk0-f169.google.com [209.85.220.169]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79DC55E4 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 15:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id j4so4045528qke.10 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 07:33:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=achow101-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=Nus+Rw0/6P/XEnPuRHfSSso0QsNn/F9L+yOAEpu8w1U=; b=c69lJ6BXZ/W1I6QhpqCdZ7Di3F0V8w7KNotVq3d8tV7jmezLlU6C4/xe9rXUEOktSW SeQ+covvlv1JnugMLrMaqtZjgV5gaW47VseLHZmQRvOPlAJ18olSxsqF+fjaZejl1C/D BieRX+BMv4EakZFLaZ/h2QCzoSfH+YcaBKoTh4xVZnDqVsM7XjGRRE1UG4ZB3kp5a1cQ WbRMULhwTB38MUKiYioEAv44W4MmylA/RoeqjDdWCUNO/cVKBHQ2KzbcXQf03D2sHZ6F LS9/gSdtrQ+0Sub0pnrSeRG5PzfabaEGR836ib2478930I7cIw7VwGRYHepW+faAO4sZ FvpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=Nus+Rw0/6P/XEnPuRHfSSso0QsNn/F9L+yOAEpu8w1U=; b=Fl3wbDAlOwPFAxWdT4tX2a6Dh6ion/qIIwY6sng1vyC203eOfE/cRBQStAM6BL2hB3 7f/va60y/sKcpJ/W13CqT7E+Aly0vrlIPEIoaWr+n/dW0+hhSq7AvbHlKeoNhJIKbrSe tLLR+GWq63TwGnJhye0x8BjxXoNhZgGbGG/7K7SoTUBI+UWnTWDlEbEePdDoF05uLPNm mzug5e+NADmhRNcRlpk2E7SKEkH0w14786ROnkqYBmPdMl35kw7hTEdtSXVzQ9EEXqSx Iw4ysw5XI5vP5o20AMa2IgQl2ARC7RzpG2GqFNuufHiVfYwTa90i2o5Sp/92W35qxmvc vweA== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FGEkU/Uy3uyv3661ugZAdXIXTUfKH+9cA1z9K2mnUlLWEuZ9R2 J6DTsRycIyYn7lxN2VbY03Tzf6ZOA5Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtMXxwr34O/aJyoLfldCuiOSSbByOn8gHuxG3hKO5aVF6+DVXEY/2PCW8DoXRzxCHQL+4MdJg== X-Received: by 10.55.164.76 with SMTP id n73mr44897301qke.286.1520609613916; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 07:33:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.247] (c-73-191-37-221.hsd1.md.comcast.net. [73.191.37.221]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v41sm688792qtb.78.2018.03.09.07.33.33 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Mar 2018 07:33:33 -0800 (PST) To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: From: Andrew Chow Message-ID: <620d4b5e-61c4-4501-9787-c73109908418@achow101.com> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 10:33:32 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------64A4E23BD82FB7F676034B1C" Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] version.relay behavior change X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 15:33:37 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------64A4E23BD82FB7F676034B1C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Looking through the code, I don't think that this behavior has changed. Are you sure that you are actually connected to Satoshi:0.15.0 nodes and not a node that has simply set their user-agent to that (i.e. not a real Satoshi:0.15.0 node)? If what you are seeing is true, it is likely a bug and not an intentional change. In that case, can you provide specific details on how to reproduce? Andrew On 03/09/2018 02:50 AM, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev wrote: > /Satoshi:0.15.0/ and later nodes appear to be no longer honoring the > version.relay=false flag (BIP37). Could someone familiar with the change > please explain the rational? > > Thanks, > > e > > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev --------------64A4E23BD82FB7F676034B1C Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Looking through the code, I don't think that this behavior has changed. Are you sure that you are actually connected to Satoshi:0.15.0 nodes and not a node that has simply set their user-agent to that (i.e. not a real Satoshi:0.15.0 node)?

If what you are seeing is true, it is likely a bug and not an intentional change. In that case, can you provide specific details on how to reproduce?

Andrew


On 03/09/2018 02:50 AM, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev wrote:
/Satoshi:0.15.0/ and later nodes appear to be no longer honoring the
version.relay=false flag (BIP37). Could someone familiar with the change
please explain the rational?

Thanks,

e




_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

--------------64A4E23BD82FB7F676034B1C--