Added back the list, I didn't mean to reply privately:
Fair enough, I'll try to find time in the next month or three to write up four plausible future scenarios for how mining incentives might work:
1) Fee-supported with very large blocks containing lots of tiny-fee transactions
2) Proof-of-idle supported (I wish Tadge Dryja would publish his proof-of-idle idea....)
3) Fees purely as transaction-spam-prevention measure, chain security via alternative consensus algorithm (in this scenario there is very little mining).
4) Fee supported with small blocks containing high-fee transactions moving coins to/from sidechains.
Would that be helpful, or do you have some reason for thinking that we should pick just one and focus all of our efforts on making that one scenario happen?
I always think it is better, when possible, not to "bet on one horse."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y_______________________________________________Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development