From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD242C0001 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 17:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73A440150 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 17:17:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gc2zdoL9jMYv for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 17:17:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-40135.protonmail.ch (mail-40135.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.135]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7165F4019B for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 17:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 17:17:24 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1620407850; bh=TqtVfHtWiwo3sTcTWWWCkTkVv/iCgbYCtb8cgZay71k=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:From; b=HLykKyy0fu3as7h7JQpwXiXKXK8e+3F7V4B8WBkuganBy1A1i60svqlfNRWvX4wRn hfMGQehZI8cNkFLZ7PY8ADsatSk8VDtkCQC0zP80KVwYAEbWBg+P3rZ0NV4UOMHJ6N 78YtBU+8G/W91nVzTmcDGvIPm0jOkftzBQxJ+Ucg= To: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" From: SatoshiSingh Reply-To: SatoshiSingh Message-ID: <6do5xN2g5LPnFeM55iJ-4C4MyXOu_KeXxy68Xt4dJQMhi3LJ8ZrLICmEUlh8JGfDmsDG12m1JDAh0e0huwK_MlyKpdfn22ru3zsm7lYLfBo=@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 07 May 2021 22:49:57 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Opinion on proof of stake in future X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 17:17:35 -0000 Hello list, I am a lurker here and like many of you I worry about the energy usage of b= itcoin mining. I understand a lot mining happens with renewable resources b= ut the impact is still high. I want to get your opinion on implementing proof of stake for bitcoin minin= g in future. For now, proof of stake is still untested and not battle teste= d like proof of work. Though someday it will be. In the following years we'll be seeing proof of stake being implemented. Sm= aller networks can test PoS which is a luxury bitcoin can't afford. Here's = how I see this the possibilities: 1 - Proof of stake isn't a good enough security mechanism 2 - Proof of state is a good security mechanism and works as intended IF PoS turns out to be good after battle testing, would you consider implem= enting it for Bitcoin? I understand this would invoke a lot of controversie= s and a hard fork that no one likes. But its important enough to consider a= hard fork. What are your opinions provided PoS does work? Love from India.