From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RqxmC-00018r-CS for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:12:24 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me designates 173.246.101.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.246.101.161; envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me; helo=mail.bluematt.me; Received: from vps.bluematt.me ([173.246.101.161] helo=mail.bluematt.me) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RqxmB-00036C-9L for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:12:24 +0000 Received: from [21.93.184.243] (66-87-104-243.pools.spcsdns.net [66.87.104.243]) by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD1DF3F8 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 03:03:51 +0100 (CET) References: <1327704664.31621.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <201201271800.31819.luke@dashjr.org> <05d62c81-ef50-4c43-8fa5-65592c8f54a4@email.android.com> <201201272045.10787.luke@dashjr.org> User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <201201272045.10787.luke@dashjr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: bitcoin-list@bluematt.me Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:12:11 -0500 To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <759be3f8-ca4c-4e36-aac1-b3894dda450d@email.android.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.4 NO_DNS_FOR_FROM DNS: Envelope sender has no MX or A DNS records -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1RqxmB-00036C-9L Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 0020: URI Scheme X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:12:24 -0000 Luke-Jr wrote: >On Friday, January 27, 2012 7:36:31 PM bitcoin-list@bluematt.me wrote: >> It was implemented in the waylaying client with the merge of >Bitcoin-Qt for >> drag and drop, and just recently for system URI handling in >> >https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/70f55355e29c8e45b607e782c5d766= 09 >> d23cc858. > >It's been implemented in many clients for nearly all 2011. >Bitcoin-Qt is just behind the pace. Not relevant. > >> However the version on the wiki armed as BIP 20 has a ton of >extraneous crap >> in it's number encoding which is not implemented in Bitcoin-Qt since >it was >> explicitly voted against at the time the spec was being discussed. > >You mean 3 months *after* the spec had a consensus and multiple=20 >implementations. I'm really not gonna reopen this debate. You made a poll that was worded= in the most biased way I could think of and still lost. The multiple im= plementations were written but you and I know of no sites that actually h= ad links to your version.