From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C49B6A82 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:15:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com (mx.kolabnow.com [95.128.36.41]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E624BA1 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1C46EA for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:15:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:date:subject:subject :from:from:received:received:received; s=dkim20160331; t= 1499847352; x=1499847374; bh=Bjzy5GqHguYLi7v3Sq6PgZRXcXuxXIiRfMU YQlVU+jQ=; b=sf1nxMJEofX5dGZn2r2uxTjsVI0ub9gzwk1qmFxK0s6lIMA6R7F dhcEDVz2QIQr8sCF+wHjyZ/T6QEDUQULgrA4E6/jM/CoEr2jrCoVimosXtAYyk+3 GmlVMl2CUm/frbBHbowRCr2L+C1Eb6RC1JViw71pWdFZkA9j8osS0GJKtjk1vDmY strmp1PjKpSez6+Wv0HXKJ5li+2FtV/0TBTwRLkqWwIQ6AF7b3NmAYyqpXYY+bxW sczV0zXyV7a87eHktYfMGS/NTj5YfB2Q6kMuyFNo5ty4yQX3UyfW20juK64yfKDu FN3836vbT3Ald3xIHRVq+VqCVI0X/zSK5/cIMj3qf+LyVu0TlFDypvp3ADQ7lwfY 5BTVslNM/TLipX1+czzLeyoQwQ5tgngDHC6j4icvY28PFE1yd+vOq9L/4VimedRQ DMsjS3N2Vz90mOvg5MOzod7jPCEP5IiQwU9D1BzPUQz51x3OK3UQG+0LG6aQk270 S2ckvHWrmcaElmYEioQ8/Jfpg9McIesDfM47m7irXb73JANIUjJhJ5AqiJoPrOao TkQmV59fYhj+arJtLQYGFFMeURIM+HkB80GAuvCvp8lYz+r01nKlusa5RkyYCbki bGPwkBUtPDe8vpTMXcbU9ZjvlcmBvwH5XpEW8P8DjCMeH6JnItsoaQs8= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x_GCSZDOmBGK for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:15:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx003.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.3]) by ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FE594C0 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:15:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm001.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.1]) by int-mx003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AF3A29CB for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:15:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Tom Zander To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:15:50 +0200 Message-ID: <7869651.CRYTeDpGy9@strawberry> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 12:30:54 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Segwit2x BIP X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:15:56 -0000 On Monday, 10 July 2017 20:38:08 CEST Jorge Tim=F3n via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I think anything less than 1 year after release of tested code by some > implementation would be irresponsible for any hardfork, even a very > simple one. Good news! Code to support 2x (the hard fork part of the proposal) has been out and=20 tested for much longer than that. =2D-=20 Tom Zander Blog: https://zander.github.io Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel