Op 28 mei 2025, om 03:07 heeft waxwing/ AdamISZ <ekaggata@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:

Hi all,

I'd like to point out that the worst case scenarios here might be even worse than one naturally thinks.

Good morning! :-)

Two more observations:

(3) I do really like the "disabled NUMS" concept in regard to taproot external keys, for paving the way to PQC in tapleaf. This is one kind of censorship that cannot be controversial.

I brought this up [0], but it was later pointed out to me that it doesn't work.

The scriptPubKey that you see on chain is not the NUMS point itself. The internal key is a NUMS point, but it's tweaked. When this tweaked key is spent, the tweak itself is not revealed, so the blockchain can't tell if a NUMS was involved, and can't block the spend.

- Sjors

https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/uUK6py0Yjq0/m/bQk2v0E5BQAJ