From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83B30ACC for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:29:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ed1-f50.google.com (mail-ed1-f50.google.com [209.85.208.50]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B26427B for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f50.google.com with SMTP id d39so2706047edb.12 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 10:29:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=l2nvChCOAap04ulaBP1myrdPLQW7jr5ah4tvRcWobyc=; b=ksA6d4alQ4vr5kKFejF/IhvpHvGPQeiwA+y25lTpvJaM7WXgSTohrVJ/mle8pHlBVs +v2W93JteY4W0RszT0CAMoSi+KENg5nMNCp5AKVDqog4KgSIqOO++8Ln6eh+r7HyMMh8 NwfLnHlngQMGiN1u4S7S/IAHD0p9sCRJkXQnB/YcsGcysLxTmhz2jB5JgoLePEHD9TM4 M0VxCsd+2Dzi85yU3eQ1P+FHTh2OJqnLuVWp5E5P7igs7F+CnajdGcdFTlRY3s+XNnej klX0ERSV47wxCf0ryEl0elYEbpCn5ocgwl7Sr3Yb5AV3C5HC4CrToVLNEzI/WJCv3FN2 BBwA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=l2nvChCOAap04ulaBP1myrdPLQW7jr5ah4tvRcWobyc=; b=Qcw6UqB3C2bkZzdP+Hvc8kn0MXlbTY+mlScVGBHSwc/F3P1Z+Fwnwoqika6fnSCfuI nYVqRZQBs30Vp9PgyRDo7+lRGUReLfqP+3w8YQNzzhp9ULWPfHzNyAgRV4JbBHv3aqJu gp4WOp8IsTOX9M511xXDoQJgCvL9EqV8+OHMCum93AM0bXMkBoFaL1YfDG9uTi3seKBQ nyQfP5bZ1fXRM6Dn9fpyewRYs9RBki+Lo0lckR9ftj9P3KQYZguXXPt7q6v23+xrrZsm ZNXPKkf+hgAWUaq7KIwLHk3rOrZaBLihFVCF5yqLh+t7UordoHk6a1x1FHkpDrtVELCx rHwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWb2n9R5ZwxV0gwDrWJoNBU73++T+eieoic3lg8RJbYmzCYRHwVM bwPRc2GM1JjyhffLtyii35c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XOlwEf6apiFSlrPH0LQW4GfS/pXXiHI/3oSNfZK/KCjoXihRq6fyY+blPSY0gDMt+r99q29Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d507:: with SMTP id ge7-v6mr2416144ejb.78.1543516154761; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 10:29:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2a02:aa16:1102:5480:b8c8:56f0:43e2:f1fe]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm785982edb.48.2018.11.29.10.29.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 29 Nov 2018 10:29:14 -0800 (PST) From: Christian Decker To: Pieter Wuille , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion , Bitcoin Dev In-Reply-To: <87d0qnrf8m.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87d0qnrf8m.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:29:10 +0100 Message-ID: <877egvrb49.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:47:14 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Safer sighashes and more granular SIGHASH_NOINPUT X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:29:17 -0000 I'd like to retract my comments regarding SINGLE. I was contacted in private and it was pointed out to me that I was confusing `sighash_single` with `sighash_single|sighash_anyonecanpay`. I appreciate the correction and would like to avoid creating confusion with my previous comments, hence the retraction :-) Cheers, Christian