From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D35F4A for ; Tue, 1 May 2018 17:35:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D30C834F for ; Tue, 1 May 2018 17:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id a8so18741028wmg.5 for ; Tue, 01 May 2018 10:35:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=GiZUNy+Iptfg3lgsK84qNEmiNncAKyvFywTbQU4D3mA=; b=s42IJ4gtASMKuUcazCfV/KCW/LJ7bduWMiQaA3DpdWh7jh5Cy/lxujzz8f8JR2OhhJ OCmOv/dflCCd9i67BL/DOb93oCbAw6em40U+IC6Nld/6m9EDTLDrom51bOM9L3xkTzgn 3qYKKsC54rlg8i6kwb0aF71jAkOQfgOk6klSXs5+PnnkXpbE/M+Az1y21mIQZ10QRsRm 8XNflyKcy0V5HF9Tw8L1v1Aw8ESuHex+roN+QK/S6i/iRUx96Qsquz38FzOSfPHyVhhT 7XVz+qd6OFeA3IE2Va+9RWneS0ZLUIApsy8hDZnwaklvQO5oMGk1CPm71vmiNE5qXzPl qgpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=GiZUNy+Iptfg3lgsK84qNEmiNncAKyvFywTbQU4D3mA=; b=D+xvdsHR2eUA10IH3r3qdrIek7WDuR+WBGoDnzCPBmUml/XOcJ8kRXa38rt8FKhraO uVeeK/ilFxH4xdrjWYbHc4VfV1JWMOTKRljCYTHrWZihfW6bPMQDRYjD9+b91KT/lfTV lv03FDY8IGVhVISbV3BGdYyjSuECDnfdBq72Yw58nFoYC3P+mXXYDpYyKBuGhdOlTdIe IA4KwzjamKJZLpu2dI8PtNzYyUg0lbw4SStrO0MZoWu2UqDu5CdkjXlDXwKS4F3q7574 0ffMJdNWGmU4JaGiAScTSie3tYKbBsEI4YVqUwt6y+nkwIsQWjHdTjeMoX6GqjyV88LO rO4w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAjcox6ZbMPfBKZDqaz86v2QHw/oVuZaBSx6P3ltZ006Rxql9ze 1EHFjOhcq1JGoLx81Sy29Tv+iwt7 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrKrXLREVH4yJN/hjBD4Ijhe1hseUFlauTibIkntyTCaQHDMyef7lGa9ajq+v8HHZ7UgIxU2g== X-Received: by 10.28.176.194 with SMTP id z185mr9662519wme.45.1525196121528; Tue, 01 May 2018 10:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a02:aa16:1102:5480:e99:3f63:40a2:83e9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r6-v6sm4056608wrg.73.2018.05.01.10.35.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 May 2018 10:35:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Christian Decker To: Russell O'Connor , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion In-Reply-To: References: <871sewirni.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 19:32:32 +0200 Message-ID: <877eongu33.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP sighash_noinput X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 17:35:23 -0000 Russell O'Connor writes: > At the risk of bikeshedding, shouldn't NOINPUT also zero out the > hashSequence so that its behaviour is consistent with ANYONECANPAY? Good catch, must've missed that somehow. I'll amend the BIP accordingly.