From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B8E19F2 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 01:19:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C65F166 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 01:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1011) id B17E91402EC; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:19:31 +1000 (AEST) From: Rusty Russell To: Mark Friedenbach In-Reply-To: <873817s2pp.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <873817s2pp.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 10:49:16 +0930 Message-ID: <878uay11ij.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 68 Questions X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 01:19:35 -0000 Rusty Russell writes: > Hi Mark, > > It looks like the code in BIP 68 compares the input's nSequence > against the transaction's nLockTime: No, forget this. I misread the code. Mark ELI5'd to me offlist, thanks! FWIW, the code works :) Cheers, Rusty.