From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90F69516 for ; Sat, 27 May 2017 10:06:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF55B159 for ; Sat, 27 May 2017 10:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1011) id 3wZdvN60wlz9s7v; Sat, 27 May 2017 20:06:40 +1000 (AEST) From: Rusty Russell To: Matt Corallo , Gregory Maxwell , Bitcoin Dev In-Reply-To: <63d03825-da9b-328d-56b8-0d062f3e0c62@mattcorallo.com> References: <87r2ze2833.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <63d03825-da9b-328d-56b8-0d062f3e0c62@mattcorallo.com> Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 10:49:33 +0930 Message-ID: <87inkn14gq.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP149 timeout-- why so far in the future? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 10:06:43 -0000 Matt Corallo writes: > A more important consideration than segwit's timeout is when code can be > released, which will no doubt be several months after SegWit's current > timeout. I was assuming it would be included in the next point release. Cheers, Rusty.