From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E893AAE0 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:07:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from charon (jb55.com [45.79.91.128]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A88F1AD for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:07:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d= jb55.com; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id; s=default; bh=6J359w7FD/006nvjMCxGbMU559FzSeKH5J1xk71i0z8=; b=rnpX47LWtx/x/6PN0K0hb1UwQ2hsJVBX/4TaGeTzqjKnbCVCiebbGP00j/ZovWr9XnI5UbSSufkW1okmtp4TufyxlZtgYvlqN+V63AJve7JFIU4hZeBVJoDu3pnLhB3Gs6y+VNv5FktHKo0hFGf94hMzAU2YQPd65kd1Sp1dQmoJmKk780MSnrg6gNK3ofPU9c9N8+dm9sC1IQ0PS3ihwPtSHupRFPCnh4kYTSkLc6K3zRJOaF6LWq+KMZW1CYsAhHCxhivr0w9O+aC2JWqmMcfvLtXCNOsdGmSv5KKvtnn/UieDpI2ujXsFX1ygn6lGKm23e7JUw8HCaNP6JacrJw== Received: from jb55.com (208.98.200.100 [208.98.200.100]) by jb55.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 044c2d45 TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:07:05 +0000 (UTC) From: William Casarin To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:07:04 -0800 Message-ID: <87k1yobu7b.fsf@jb55.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:43:21 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Protocol-Level Pruning X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:07:06 -0000 Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev writes: > It's not clear to me if you are have looked at the previous UTXO set > commitment proposals. > > some utxo set commitment bookmarks (a little old) > http://diyhpl.us/~bryan/irc/bitcoin/utxo-commitments-or-fraud-proofs.stdout.txt > > TXO bitfields > http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/sf-bitcoin-meetup/2017-07-08-bram-cohen-merkle-sets/ > > delayed TXO commitments > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-May/012715.html > > TXO commitments do not need a soft-fork to be useful > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-February/013591.html > > rolling UTXO set hashes > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014337.html > > lotta other resources available, including source code proposals.. Thanks! Has anyone categoried list discussions by topic like this? It seems a lot of this stuff is scattered between mailing lists, irc conversations, etc and can be hard to know whats floating out there. -- https://jb55.com