From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D86D1588 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 00:09:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A95C186 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 00:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1011) id 3A537140D6B; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:09:04 +1000 (AEST) From: Rusty Russell To: Adam Back In-Reply-To: References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org> <20150929200302.GA5051@amethyst.visucore.com> <87wpv8ft61.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:34:19 +0930 Message-ID: <87k2r7pi7w.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY! X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:09:07 -0000 Adam Back writes: > I think from discussion with Gavin sometime during the montreal > scaling bitcoin workshop, XT maybe willing to make things easy and > adapt what it's doing. For example in relation to versionBits Gavin > said he'd be willing to update XT with an updated/improved > versionBits, for example. > > It seems more sensible to do what is simple and clean and have both > core do that, and XT follow if there is no particular philosophy > debate on a given technical topic. This seems a quite constructive > approach. That too, but let's not break existing software. This proposal allows that, and is trivial. Cheers, Rusty.