From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDD7F5A7; Tue, 1 May 2018 12:05:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2729672; Tue, 1 May 2018 12:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id o78so18786247wmg.0; Tue, 01 May 2018 05:05:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=YxiSQv5n5L+vjO9MbeBmVwhcZm194Ab9bDgsLt6XmYY=; b=ag4Bg+Ep1oCUxMVEkkZfF0qTIHeJDcdWGSfTIQctoTZ+iiXcvYQjv7E+XYOyklNZZ4 JWVWIFksqBAFoRcbpAwszvmhqkPJjN45RbclHPx/zdWTTZy9zgkQWrPASJv1l1WzBTXE sHZl/3e1LmxwO1IvDVMIJ/0MI83GAGYSuFe1ywYDDFIl6SwVrwcDwF2ps1zAdwc6zd3t C5Ti/O5wkvZcubZpgaJffte+C6ivcdKjsv17wiVPDofIvO2H/x7Mwy4bTp7eYFE1YPxu klAntGQz8Yg0mh7AgnZ6VNjBIBqn++Ww9Ozgc3CM3OvK8zZsTiYSFXH0eguUEXlTfeUP FHjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=YxiSQv5n5L+vjO9MbeBmVwhcZm194Ab9bDgsLt6XmYY=; b=AWRGkvWZWXZv/69X7v8n7Pqpr3rMe7nv1gxXl/SvQkwhKA/IWWFaOPZo3QEJkMCVLi 99TRV6BPiteWAE4APGLrNaWItOzbV1vR1sWK530OeuVWpyXnk0Ov60nX3Kb13fuSCTxD DHkFy73Hk1D3diMk5YIMa222zL23YKqVXWkntffVslv7a1mLlk6NCceM+Fi8xnUdq6vL OCVYELP0VuYMJaDgYO2mnqwO1eOxYRfLEnxQugy4rd+lKEJRq3U7aoLj0kf7xUJ0KruJ D6XAsBwNyCb8zgsTDGO7Q0J/ZBDz1Knun3roxq0Kr5wijvhEsE5q7wgvrupH0W99/GxH FhJw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCzzTzpDwPQeeUthgVcxltnrgYLOodCKAfMMXuA9TIWBY9hzQbz 6wQQafg85ZQT9lww08ano8HCFgDg X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqwThU6iLI+V63PX58kjKVkMLSomsd038LZmnsKeQ9+zBXlY3OgBUdFU1fX0cfk3jsPv1MeSg== X-Received: by 10.28.88.148 with SMTP id m142mr6758542wmb.10.1525176311557; Tue, 01 May 2018 05:05:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a02:aa16:1102:5480:e99:3f63:40a2:83e9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z18-v6sm12580715wrc.36.2018.05.01.05.05.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 May 2018 05:05:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Christian Decker To: ZmnSCPxj In-Reply-To: <9OOOx7l1TdSQBlgt0MuRvtKzuxa_Z3g0kF315Legl5L-UOvvNZFL_tgAuWhe015Q-ZtOdYfI9iGJkAqhfb42RqazYq0JvTCzXaEr1XkD_iY=@protonmail.com> References: <874ljsitvx.fsf@gmail.com> <9OOOx7l1TdSQBlgt0MuRvtKzuxa_Z3g0kF315Legl5L-UOvvNZFL_tgAuWhe015Q-ZtOdYfI9iGJkAqhfb42RqazYq0JvTCzXaEr1XkD_iY=@protonmail.com> Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 13:38:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87sh7bhahn.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] eltoo: A Simplified update Mechanism for Lightning and Off-Chain Contracts X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 12:05:14 -0000 ZmnSCPxj writes: > Good morning Christian, > > This is very interesting indeed! > > I have started skimming through the paper. > > I am uncertain if the below text is correct? > >> Throughout this paper we will use the terms *input script* to refer to `witnessProgram` and `scriptPubKey`, and *output script* to refer to the `witness` or `scriptSig`. > > Figure 2 contains to what looks to me like a `witnessProgram`, `scriptPubKey`, or `redeemScript` but refers to it as an "output script": > >> OP_IF >> 10 OP_CSV >> 2 As Bs 2 OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY >> OP_ELSE >> 2 Au Bu 2 OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY >> OP_ENDIF >> >> Figure 2: The output script used by the on-chain update transactions. > > Regards, > ZmnSCPxj Darn last minute changes! Yes, you are right, I seem to have flipped the two definitions. I'll fix that up and push a new version.