From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RtFvG-0005Yy-C6 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:59:14 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from 2508ds5-oebr.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.54.49] helo=mail.ceptacle.com) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RtFvA-0006j4-JH for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:59:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ceptacle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11A316A0DFA; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:59:02 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ceptacle.com Received: from mail.ceptacle.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.ceptacle.private [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UTKm9-+NfEtC; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:59:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from [109.105.106.198] (unknown [109.105.106.198]) by mail.ceptacle.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D436F16A0DF0; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:59:01 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Michael_Gr=F8nager?= In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:59:01 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9B2FB922-A86B-4189-926C-C6DB51A1C17F@ceptacle.com> References: <83F45CA3-D54A-499A-8A20-922CDEE52993@ceptacle.com> To: Aidan Thornton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1RtFvA-0006j4-JH Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.5.2 tag in github ?? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:59:14 -0000 Hi Aidan, Thanks, and the number is still 140700 - do we have a policy / logic on = adding new checkpoints ? It seems to me that the number could easily be = bumped to 160000 by now ? Cheers, Michael =20 On 03/02/2012, at 10:52, Aidan Thornton wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Michael Gr=F8nager = wrote: >> Hi Gavin, others? >>=20 >> I am trying to redo the performance test of the libcoin client = against the 0.5.2 Satoshi client, that I have learned also have received = quite some improvements in speed since 0.4.0 (e.g. from not verifying = signatures on early blocks). >>=20 >> However, I cannot find any tag with v0.5.2 in github: >> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tags >=20 > I think that tag's in > = https://gitorious.org/+bitcoin-stable-developers/bitcoin/bitcoind-stable > - a certain amount of developer politics seems to be involved, and > v0.5.2 may not have been pushed to the official github repository. Michael Gronager, PhD Director, Ceptacle Jens Juels Gade 33 2100 Copenhagen E Mobile: +45 31 45 14 01 E-mail: gronager@ceptacle.com Web: http://www.ceptacle.com/